Can Smaller Pixel Size and Use of Digital Phase Contrast Mammography Improve Observer Performance in Diagnostic Mammography?

被引：0
|
作者：
Schmidt, R. [1 ]
Nishikawa, R. [1 ]
Shimauchi, A. [1 ]
Newstead, G. [1 ]
Karkani, K. [1 ]
Edwards, A. [1 ]
Papaioannou, J. [1 ]
Makin, S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY | 2010年 / 194卷 / 05期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
070
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital mammography detects smaller lesion size and contrast than conventional mammography
    Levy, LD
    Dana, A
    Martin, B
    Meyer, D
    Teman, G
    Benali, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 284 - 284
  • [2] Analysis of the influence of pixel size on diagnostic accuracy in digital mammography
    Muller, S
    Rick, A
    Priday, K
    Levy, L
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 95 - 101
  • [3] Digital mammography: Observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications
    Chan, HP
    Helvie, MA
    Petrick, N
    Sahiner, B
    Adler, DD
    Paramagul, C
    Roubidoux, MA
    Blane, CE
    Joynt, LK
    Wilson, TE
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Goodsitt, MM
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (06) : 454 - 466
  • [4] Can the delayed phase of quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography improve the diagnostic performance on breast masses?
    Xu, Weimin
    Zheng, Bowen
    Chen, Weiguo
    Wen, Chanjuan
    Zeng, Hui
    He, Zilong
    Qin, Genggeng
    Li, Yingjia
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (08) : 3684 - 3697
  • [5] Can digital mammography improve low contrast lesion detection?
    Qu, G
    Huda, W
    Laine, AF
    Steinbach, BG
    Honeyman, JC
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY '96, 1996, 1119 : 451 - 454
  • [6] Digital mammography: Observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications
    Chan, HP
    Helvie, MA
    Petrick, N
    Sahiner, B
    Adler, DD
    Blane, CE
    Joynt, LK
    Paramagul, C
    Roubidoux, MA
    Wilson, TE
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Goddsitt, MM
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 394 - 397
  • [7] Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report
    Fedon, Christian
    Rigon, Luigi
    Arfelli, Fulvia
    Dreossi, Diego
    Quai, Elisa
    Tonutti, Maura
    Tromba, Giuliana
    Cova, Maria Assunta
    Longo, Renata
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (01)
  • [8] Contrast enhanced digital mammography - a useful adjuvant to digital mammography in predicting tumour size
    McGuire, A.
    O'Leary, D. P.
    Ryan, M.
    Khan, Z.
    Corrigan, M.
    Redmond, H. P.
    Relihan, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 22 - 23
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography
    Yuzkan, Sabahattin
    Cengiz, Duygu
    Hekimsoy, Ilhan
    Okcu, Ozlem Sezgin
    Oktay, Aysenur
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [10] The dependency of pixel size on calcification reproducibility in digital mammography
    Kuwabara, Takao
    Iwasaki, Nobuyuki
    Yamane, Katsutoshi
    Kojima, Tetsuya
    Fukushima, Kimitake
    Agano, Toshitaka
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 6515
12345