Can Smaller Pixel Size and Use of Digital Phase Contrast Mammography Improve Observer Performance in Diagnostic Mammography?

被引：0
|
作者：
Schmidt, R. [1 ]
Nishikawa, R. [1 ]
Shimauchi, A. [1 ]
Newstead, G. [1 ]
Karkani, K. [1 ]
Edwards, A. [1 ]
Papaioannou, J. [1 ]
Makin, S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY | 2010年 / 194卷 / 05期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
070
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Hermann, K.-P.
    Wenkel, E.
    Adamietz, B.
    Lell, M.
    Boehner, C.
    Uder, M.
    Bautz, W. A.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (05): : 492 - 496
  • [22] Modelling the imaging performance and low contrast detectability in digital mammography
    Spyropoulou, V.
    Kalyvas, N.
    Gaitanis, A.
    Michail, C.
    Panayiotakis, G.
    Kandarakis, I.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2009, 4
  • [23] Shape determination of microcalcifications in simulated digital mammography images with varying pixel size
    Ruschin, M
    Båth, M
    Hemdal, B
    Tingberg, A
    Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 2005, 5749 : 288 - 299
  • [24] Assessment of mass detection performance in contrast enhanced digital mammography
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    de Carvalho, Pablo Milioni
    Li, Zhijin
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Muller, Serge
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 9416
  • [25] Impact of pixel size for the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcification clusters in digital mammography
    Levy, LD
    Muller, SL
    Priday, K
    Rick, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 105 - 105
  • [26] Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography:: A pilot study
    Ruschin, M
    Hemdal, B
    Andersson, I
    Börjesson, S
    Håkansson, M
    Båth, M
    Grahn, A
    Tingberg, A
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) : 415 - 423
  • [27] Contrast enhanced digital mammography as an adjuvant in predicting breast cancer size
    McGuire, A.
    O'Leary, D. P.
    Ryan, M.
    Khan, Z.
    Corrigan, M.
    Redmond, H. P.
    Relihan, N.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S177 - S177
  • [28] The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography
    Burnside, ES
    Park, JM
    Fine, JP
    Sisney, GA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (03) : 790 - 796
  • [29] How does observer training affect imaging performance in digital mammography?
    Huda, W
    Qu, GY
    Jing, ZX
    Steinbach, BG
    Honeyman, JC
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 3981 : 259 - 266
  • [30] The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography
    Burnside, ES
    Park, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 48 - 48
12345