Kinematic Analysis of the Indirect Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Implications for Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Placement

被引:24
|
作者
Pathare, Neil P. [1 ]
Nicholas, Stephen J. [1 ]
Colbrunn, Robb [2 ]
McHugh, Malachy P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lenox Hill Hosp, Nicholas Inst Sports Med & Athlet Trauma, New York, NY 10075 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Orthopaed Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
IN-SITU FORCES; POSTEROLATERAL BUNDLES; JOINT KINEMATICS; PATELLAR TENDON; KNEE KINEMATICS; BONE TUNNEL; RECONSTRUCTION; GRAFT; SINGLE; ATTACHMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine the effect of debriding the indirect insertion component of the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment on tibiofemoral kinematics when compared with the intact knee. Methods: Knee kinematics were measured in 9 cadaveric knees with the ACL intact, after indirect insertion debridement, and after ACL transection. Three loading conditions were used: (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load, (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 5-Nm internal tibial torque, and (3) a simulated robotic pivot shift. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was recorded in response to anterior and combined loads at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion. Posterior tibial translation and external tibial rotation were recorded during the simulated pivot shift. Results: With an anterior load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.37 +/- 0.24 mm at 0 degrees (P = .002) and by 0.16 +/- 0.19 mm at 15 degrees (P = .033; increases < 1 mm in all specimens). ACL transection increased ATT in response to an anterior load (P = .0001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees compared with the intact and debrided states (11.26 +/- 1.15 mm and 11.04 +/- 1.08 mm, respectively). With a combined load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.17 +/- 0.11 mm at 0 degrees (P = .001; increases < 0.3 mm in all specimens) with no effect at other angles. ACL transection increased ATT in response to a combined load (P = .001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees (4.45 +/- 0.85 mm v ACL intact and 4.44 +/- 0.84 mm v debrided indirect insertion). In the ACL intact condition, the pivot shift produced 1.29 +/- 1.34 mm of posterior tibial translation and 1.54 +/- 1.61 degrees of external tibial rotation, as compared with 1.28 +/- 1.34 mm and 1.54 +/- 1.47 degrees, respectively, after debridement (P = .68 and P = .99, respectively) and 12.79 +/- 3.22 mm and 17.60 +/- 4.30 degrees, respectively, after ACL transection (P = .0001). Conclusions: The indirect femoral ACL insertion contributes minimally to restraint of tibial translation and rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1438
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
    Bing Wang
    Yongjie Ye
    Long Yao
    Ancheng Wei
    Xin Huang
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Xiaojun Yu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [42] Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
    Wang, Bing
    Ye, Yongjie
    Yao, Long
    Wei, Ancheng
    Huang, Xin
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Yu, Xiaojun
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [43] High variability in anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint: Implications for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Cheng, Rongshan
    Yang, Yangyang
    Baumgaertner, Bodo
    Helmy, Naeder
    Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
    KNEE, 2021, 30 : 141 - 147
  • [44] Femoral Tunnel Position Affects Postoperative Femoral Tunnel Widening after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tibialis Anterior Allograft
    Lee, Sung-Sahn
    Kim, Il Su
    Shin, Tae Soo
    Lee, Jeounghun
    Lee, Dae-Hee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [45] Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position
    van der List, J. P.
    Zuiderbaan, H. A.
    Nawabi, D. H.
    Pearle, A. D.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (05) : 1617 - 1624
  • [46] Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position
    J. P. van der List
    H. A. Zuiderbaan
    D. H. Nawabi
    A. D. Pearle
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 1617 - 1624
  • [47] Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Giron, F
    Cuomo, P
    Aglietti, P
    Bull, AMJ
    Amis, AA
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [48] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Creation by Use of Anteromedial Portal
    Bottoni, Craig R.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (11): : 1319 - 1319
  • [49] Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Francesco Giron
    Pierluigi Cuomo
    Paolo Aglietti
    Anthony M. J. Bull
    Andrew A. Amis
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2006, 14 : 250 - 256
  • [50] Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lee, Myung Chul
    Seong, Sang Cheol
    Lee, Sahnghoon
    Chang, Chong Bum
    Park, Yoon Keun
    Jo, Hyunchul
    Kim, Choong Hyun
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (07): : 771 - 778