Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Bing [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Yongjie [3 ]
Yao, Long [4 ]
Wei, Ancheng [4 ]
Huang, Xin [4 ]
Wang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Yu, Xiaojun [1 ]
机构
[1] Suining Cent Hosp, Orthoped, 127 Desheng West Rd, Suining 629000, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, 234 Fujiang Rd, Nanchong 637100, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Fifth Peoples Hosp, Orthoped, 33 Mashi St, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[4] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, 1166 Liutai Ave, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Critical corner; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Finite element; Biomechanics; Knee joint injury; CRITICAL CORNER; OUTSIDE-IN; INSIDE-OUT; GRAFT; KNEE; INJURIES; LAXITY; VITRO;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAt present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the "critical corner" that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee.MethodsCT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia.ResultsAmong the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60 degrees and 90 degrees). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13.ConclusionIn summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
    Bing Wang
    Yongjie Ye
    Long Yao
    Ancheng Wei
    Xin Huang
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Xiaojun Yu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [2] Finite element analysis of different posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques
    Qi, Y. S.
    Yu, J. K.
    Zhang, X. J.
    Hu, L.
    Xu, Y. S.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 9 - 10
  • [3] Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yu, Joseph
    Garrett, William E.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 14 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [4] Use of a Fluoroscopic Overlay to Guide Femoral Tunnel Placement During Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Araujo, Paulo H.
    Moloney, Gele
    Rincon, Gustavo
    Carey, Robert
    Zhang, Xudong
    Harner, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (11): : 2673 - 2679
  • [5] Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in postoperative posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Brand, JC
    Cole, J
    Sumida, K
    Caborn, DNM
    Johnson, DL
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (07): : 688 - 694
  • [6] The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel placement
    Handy, MH
    Blessey, PB
    Kline, AJ
    Miller, MD
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (06): : 711 - 714
  • [7] Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    J.-D. Nicodeme
    C. Löcherbach
    B. M. Jolles
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1556 - 1562
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging of tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Mariani, PP
    Adriani, E
    Bellelli, A
    Maresca, G
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 15 (07): : 733 - 740
  • [9] Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    Nicodeme, J. -D.
    Loecherbach, C.
    Jolles, B. M.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (07) : 1556 - 1562
  • [10] Optimizing Graft Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis
    Westermann, Robert W.
    Wolf, Brian R.
    Elkins, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (02) : 97 - 106