Kinematic Analysis of the Indirect Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Implications for Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Placement

被引:24
|
作者
Pathare, Neil P. [1 ]
Nicholas, Stephen J. [1 ]
Colbrunn, Robb [2 ]
McHugh, Malachy P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lenox Hill Hosp, Nicholas Inst Sports Med & Athlet Trauma, New York, NY 10075 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Orthopaed Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
IN-SITU FORCES; POSTEROLATERAL BUNDLES; JOINT KINEMATICS; PATELLAR TENDON; KNEE KINEMATICS; BONE TUNNEL; RECONSTRUCTION; GRAFT; SINGLE; ATTACHMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine the effect of debriding the indirect insertion component of the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment on tibiofemoral kinematics when compared with the intact knee. Methods: Knee kinematics were measured in 9 cadaveric knees with the ACL intact, after indirect insertion debridement, and after ACL transection. Three loading conditions were used: (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load, (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 5-Nm internal tibial torque, and (3) a simulated robotic pivot shift. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was recorded in response to anterior and combined loads at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion. Posterior tibial translation and external tibial rotation were recorded during the simulated pivot shift. Results: With an anterior load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.37 +/- 0.24 mm at 0 degrees (P = .002) and by 0.16 +/- 0.19 mm at 15 degrees (P = .033; increases < 1 mm in all specimens). ACL transection increased ATT in response to an anterior load (P = .0001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees compared with the intact and debrided states (11.26 +/- 1.15 mm and 11.04 +/- 1.08 mm, respectively). With a combined load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.17 +/- 0.11 mm at 0 degrees (P = .001; increases < 0.3 mm in all specimens) with no effect at other angles. ACL transection increased ATT in response to a combined load (P = .001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees (4.45 +/- 0.85 mm v ACL intact and 4.44 +/- 0.84 mm v debrided indirect insertion). In the ACL intact condition, the pivot shift produced 1.29 +/- 1.34 mm of posterior tibial translation and 1.54 +/- 1.61 degrees of external tibial rotation, as compared with 1.28 +/- 1.34 mm and 1.54 +/- 1.47 degrees, respectively, after debridement (P = .68 and P = .99, respectively) and 12.79 +/- 3.22 mm and 17.60 +/- 4.30 degrees, respectively, after ACL transection (P = .0001). Conclusions: The indirect femoral ACL insertion contributes minimally to restraint of tibial translation and rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1438
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement of the whole and midsubstance femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: The comparison with the elliptically calculated femoral anterior cruciate ligament footprint area
    Iwama, Genki
    Iriuchishima, Takanori
    Horaguchi, Takashi
    Aizawa, Shin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 53 (06) : 727 - 731
  • [22] Femoral Cross-Pin Safety in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Function of Femoral Tunnel Position and Insertion Angle
    Krupp, Ryan
    Scovell, Field
    Cook, Chad
    Nyland, John
    Wyland, Doug
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (01): : 83 - 88
  • [23] Radiologic assessment of femoral and tibial tunnel placement based on anatomic landmarks in arthroscopic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Sandeep Kumar Nema
    Gopisankar Balaji
    Sujiv Akkilagunta
    Jagdish Menon
    Murali Poduval
    Dilip Patro
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2017, 51 : 286 - 291
  • [24] Measurement of the Whole and Midsubstance Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: The Comparison with the Elliptically Calculated Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint Area
    Genki Iwama
    Takanori Iriuchishima
    Takashi Horaguchi
    Shin Aizawa
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2019, 53 : 727 - 731
  • [25] Radiologic assessment of femoral and tibial tunnel placement based on anatomic landmarks in arthroscopic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Nema, Sandeep Kumar
    Balaji, Gopisankar
    Akkilagunta, Sujiv
    Menon, Jagdish
    Poduval, Murali
    Patro, Dilip
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 51 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [26] Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Mochizuki, T
    Muneta, T
    Nagase, T
    Shirasawa, S
    Akita, K
    Sekiya, I
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (04): : 356 - 361
  • [27] Tibial Tunnel Placement Accuracy During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Independent Femoral Versus Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Drilling Techniques
    Keller, Thomas C.
    Tompkins, Marc
    Economopoulos, Kostas
    Milewski, Matthew D.
    Gaskin, Cree
    Brockmeier, Stephen
    Hart, Joseph
    Miller, Mark D.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (09): : 1116 - 1123
  • [28] Fracture of the femoral tunnel after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wilson, TC
    Rosenblum, WJ
    Johnson, DL
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2004, 20 (05): : e45 - e47
  • [29] A Simple Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Position The Inclination Angle and Femoral Tunnel Angle
    Illingworth, Kenneth David
    Hensler, Daniel
    Working, Zachary Mark
    Macalena, Jeffrey Alexander
    Tashman, Scott
    Fu, Freddie H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (12): : 2611 - 2618
  • [30] Influence of the femoral tunnel location and angle on the contact pressure in the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Segawa, H
    Koga, Y
    Omori, G
    Sakamoto, M
    Hara, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03): : 444 - 448