An efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Z. [1 ]
Ruan, X. X. [1 ]
Duan, M. F. [1 ]
Jiang, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engn, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; Epistemic uncertainty; Evidence theory; Probability bound analysis; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CONVEX MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; REPRESENTATIONS; APPROXIMATION; INFORMATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.033
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Evidence theory is widely regarded as a promising mathematical tool for epistemic uncertainty analysis. However, the heavy computational burden has severely hindered its application in practical engineering problems, which is essentially caused by the discrete uncertainty quantification mechanism of evidence variables. In this paper, an efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory is proposed, based on a probabilistic and continuous representation of the epistemic uncertainty presented in evidence variables. Firstly, each evidence variable is equivalently transformed to a Johnson p-box which is a family of Johnson distributions enveloped by the CDF bounds. Subsequently, the probability bound analysis is conducted for the input Johnson p-box and the response CDF based on monotonicity analysis. Finally, the CDF bounds of the response are directly calculated using the CDF bounds of the input Johnson p-boxes, by which a high computational efficiency is achieved for the proposed method. Two mathematical problems and two engineering applications are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 466
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An improved failure mode and effects analysis method based on uncertainty measure in the evidence theory
    Wu, Dongdong
    Tang, Yongchuan
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (05) : 1786 - 1807
  • [42] Reliability analysis method based on evidence theory under multi-source uncertainty
    Meng, Xin-Jia
    Jing, Shi-Kai
    Liu, Ji-Hong
    Zhang, Li-Xiang
    Zhang, He
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2015, 21 (03): : 648 - 655
  • [43] Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty
    Nannapaneni, Saideep
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 155 : 9 - 20
  • [44] The Role of Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Analysis
    Dubois, Didier
    SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2010, 2010, 6379 : 11 - 15
  • [45] Epistemic uncertainty assessment using Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Neural Networks
    Giovanis, Dimitris G.
    Fragiadakis, Michalis
    Papadopoulos, Vissarion
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 14 (02) : 529 - 547
  • [46] Epistemic uncertainty assessment using Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Neural Networks
    Dimitris G. Giovanis
    Michalis Fragiadakis
    Vissarion Papadopoulos
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 14 : 529 - 547
  • [47] A new polynomial chaos expansion method for uncertainty analysis with aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
    He, Wanxin
    Gao, Chao
    Li, Gang
    Zhou, Jinhang
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2024, 67 (10)
  • [48] An Efficient System Reliability Analysis Method Based on Evidence Theory With Parameter Correlations
    Zhang, Dequan
    Hao, Zhijie
    Liang, Yunfei
    Wang, Fang
    Liu, Weipeng
    Han, Xu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2024, : 1 - 14
  • [49] An approximation approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory
    Bae, HR
    Grandhi, RV
    Canfield, RA
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 86 (03) : 215 - 225
  • [50] Material model uncertainty quantification using evidence theory
    Salehghaffari, S.
    Rais-Rohani, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 227 (10) : 2165 - 2181