An efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Z. [1 ]
Ruan, X. X. [1 ]
Duan, M. F. [1 ]
Jiang, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engn, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; Epistemic uncertainty; Evidence theory; Probability bound analysis; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CONVEX MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; REPRESENTATIONS; APPROXIMATION; INFORMATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.033
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Evidence theory is widely regarded as a promising mathematical tool for epistemic uncertainty analysis. However, the heavy computational burden has severely hindered its application in practical engineering problems, which is essentially caused by the discrete uncertainty quantification mechanism of evidence variables. In this paper, an efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory is proposed, based on a probabilistic and continuous representation of the epistemic uncertainty presented in evidence variables. Firstly, each evidence variable is equivalently transformed to a Johnson p-box which is a family of Johnson distributions enveloped by the CDF bounds. Subsequently, the probability bound analysis is conducted for the input Johnson p-box and the response CDF based on monotonicity analysis. Finally, the CDF bounds of the response are directly calculated using the CDF bounds of the input Johnson p-boxes, by which a high computational efficiency is achieved for the proposed method. Two mathematical problems and two engineering applications are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 466
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Uncertainty Theory-Based Structural Reliability Analysis and Design Optimization under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Zhou, Shuang
    Zhang, Jianguo
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Huang, Ying
    Wen, Meilin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [32] Uncertainty-Aware Resampling Method for Imbalanced Classification Using Evidence Theory
    Grina, Fares
    Elouedi, Zied
    Lefevre, Eric
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, ECSQARU 2021, 2021, 12897 : 342 - 353
  • [33] Sensitivity Analysis of Epistemic Uncertainty on Input Parameters and System Structure Using Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Hou, Yunhui
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [34] Epistemic uncertainty quantification techniques including evidence theory for large-scale structures
    Bae, HR
    Grandhi, RV
    Canfield, RA
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2004, 82 (13-14) : 1101 - 1112
  • [35] Anxiety as an "epistemic'' emotion: An uncertainty theory of anxiety
    Miceli, M
    Castelfranchi, C
    ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2005, 18 (04): : 291 - 319
  • [36] An Efficient Mechanical Structure Reliability Analysis Method Based on Evidence Theory
    Liu X.
    Gong M.
    Zhou Z.
    Li B.
    Dong J.
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 31 (17): : 2031 - 2037
  • [37] Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty propagation using Dempster-Shafer theory
    He, Yanyan
    Hussaini, M. Yousuff
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 429
  • [39] Epistemic uncertainty quantification in structural systems using improved universal grey theory
    Kumar, Akshay
    Balu, A. S.
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 56
  • [40] A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory
    Helton, J. C.
    Johnson, J. D.
    Oberkampf, W. L.
    Storlie, C. B.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 196 (37-40) : 3980 - 3998