An efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Z. [1 ]
Ruan, X. X. [1 ]
Duan, M. F. [1 ]
Jiang, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engn, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; Epistemic uncertainty; Evidence theory; Probability bound analysis; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CONVEX MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; REPRESENTATIONS; APPROXIMATION; INFORMATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.033
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Evidence theory is widely regarded as a promising mathematical tool for epistemic uncertainty analysis. However, the heavy computational burden has severely hindered its application in practical engineering problems, which is essentially caused by the discrete uncertainty quantification mechanism of evidence variables. In this paper, an efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory is proposed, based on a probabilistic and continuous representation of the epistemic uncertainty presented in evidence variables. Firstly, each evidence variable is equivalently transformed to a Johnson p-box which is a family of Johnson distributions enveloped by the CDF bounds. Subsequently, the probability bound analysis is conducted for the input Johnson p-box and the response CDF based on monotonicity analysis. Finally, the CDF bounds of the response are directly calculated using the CDF bounds of the input Johnson p-boxes, by which a high computational efficiency is achieved for the proposed method. Two mathematical problems and two engineering applications are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 466
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epistemic Uncertainty and Legal Theory
    Soper, Philip
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE, 2010, 23 (01): : 249 - 253
  • [22] Novel rough set theory-based method for epistemic uncertainty modeling, analysis and applications
    Wang, Chong
    Fan, Haoran
    Wu, Tao
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2023, 113 : 456 - 474
  • [23] Reduced Space Optimization-Based Evidence Theory Method for Response Analysis of Space-Coiled Acoustic Metamaterials with Epistemic Uncertainty
    Yin, Shengwen
    Chen, Linfang
    Qin, Haogang
    Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2023, 2023
  • [24] An efficient structural uncertainty propagation method based on evidence domain analysis
    Cao, Lixiong
    Liu, Jie
    Wang, Qingyun
    Jiang, Chao
    Zhang, Lianyi
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 194 : 26 - 35
  • [25] Solution-Space-Reduction-Based Evidence Theory Method for Stiffness Evaluation of Air Springs with Epistemic Uncertainty
    Yin, Shengwen
    Jin, Keliang
    Bai, Yu
    Zhou, Wei
    Wang, Zhonggang
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [26] Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty quantification using fuzzy set theory
    He, Yanyan
    Mirzargar, Mahsa
    Kirby, Robert M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2015, 66 : 1 - 15
  • [27] Treatment of epistemic uncertainty in conjunction analysis with Dempster-Shafer theory
    Sánchez, Luis
    Vasile, Massimiliano
    Sanvido, Silvia
    Merz, Klaus
    Taillan, Christophe
    Advances in Space Research, 2024, 74 (11) : 5639 - 5686
  • [28] An Uncertainty Reasoning Method Based On Evidence Theory
    He, Yan
    Xiong, Caiquan
    Zhan, Yifan
    2013 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION (ICNC), 2013, : 1021 - 1025
  • [29] Sensitivity analysis of structural response uncertainty propagation using evidence theory
    H.-R. Bae
    R. V. Grandhi
    R. A. Canfield
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 31 : 270 - 279
  • [30] Sensitivity analysis of structural response uncertainty propagation using evidence theory
    Bae, HR
    Grandhi, RV
    Canfield, RA
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 31 (04) : 270 - 279