Cone beam computed tomography based image guidance and quality assessment of prostate cancer for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy in the pelvis

被引:4
|
作者
Edmund, Jens M. [1 ,2 ]
Andreasen, Daniel [3 ]
Van Leemput, Koen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte & Herlev Hosp, Dept Oncol, Radiotherapy Res Unit, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Inst, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Hlth Technol, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
MRI-only RT; IGRT; Synthetic CT; Pseudo CT; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy; Cone beam CT; SYNTHETIC CT GENERATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI SEQUENCES; PSEUDO-CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) based on magentic resonance imaging (MRI) only is currently used clinically in the pelvis. A synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is needed for dose planning. Here, we investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) based MRI-only image guided RT (IGRT) and sCT image quality. Materials and methods: CT, MRI and CBCT scans of ten prostate cancer patients were included. The MRI was converted to a sCT using a multi-atlas approach. The sCT, CT and MR images were auto-matched with the CBCT on the bony anatomy. Paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were created. CT numbers were converted to relative electron (RED) and mass densities (DES) using a standard calibration curve for the CT and sCT. For the CBCT RED/DES conversion, a phantom and paired CT-CBCT population based calibration curve was used. For the latter, the CBCT numbers were averaged in 100 HU bins and the known RED/DES of the CT were assigned. The paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were averaged in bins of 10 HU or 0.01 RED/DES. The median absolute error (MeAE) between the sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT bins was calculated. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were carried out for the IGRT and MeAE study. Results: The mean sCT or MR IGRT difference from CT was <= 2 mm but significant differences were observed. A CBCT HU or phantom-based RED/DES MeAE did not estimate the sCT quality similar to a CT based MeAE but the CBCT population-based RED/DES MeAE did. Conclusions: MRI-only CBCT-based IGRT seems feasible but caution is advised. A MeAE around 0.1 DES could call for sCT quality inspection.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 60
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
    Moghanaki, Drew
    Turkbey, Baris
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Frank, Steven J.
    McLaughlin, Patrick W.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 27 (01) : 21 - 33
  • [42] Imaging Aspects of Palatal Torus in Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance: Case Report
    El Achkar, Vivian Narana Ribeiro
    Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira De Castro
    Pinto, Antonione Santos Bezerra
    Do Prado, Renata Falchete
    Kaminagakura, Estela
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2016, 50 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [43] A Learning-Based Method to Improve Pelvis Cone Beam CT Image Quality for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Yang, X.
    Wang, T.
    Lei, Y.
    Jiang, X.
    Jani, A.
    Patel, P. R.
    Tang, X.
    Dhabaan, A. H.
    Curran, W. J., Jr.
    Liu, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E377 - E378
  • [44] Geometric impact and dose estimation of on-patient placement of a lightweight receiver coil in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy workflow for prostate cancer
    Scherman, Jonas
    af Wetterstedt, Sacha
    Persson, Emilia
    Olsson, Lars E.
    Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 26
  • [45] Assessment of unintended shifts during frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery using cone beam computed tomography image guidance
    Seneviratne, Danushka S.
    Hadley, Austin R.
    Peterson, Jennifer L.
    Malouff, Timothy D.
    Reimer, Ronald
    Herchko, Steve M.
    May, Byron
    Ko, Stephen
    Trifiletti, Daniel M.
    Vallow, Laura A.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 148 (02) : 273 - 279
  • [46] Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow
    Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
    Persson, Emilia
    Gustafsson, Christian
    Kjellen, Elisabeth
    Ambolt, Petra
    Engelholm, Silke
    Nilsson, Per
    Olsson, Lars E.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 : 89 - 91
  • [47] Assessment of unintended shifts during frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery using cone beam computed tomography image guidance
    Danushka S. Seneviratne
    Austin R. Hadley
    Jennifer L. Peterson
    Timothy D. Malouff
    Ronald Reimer
    Steve M. Herchko
    Byron May
    Stephen Ko
    Daniel M. Trifiletti
    Laura A. Vallow
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2020, 148 : 273 - 279
  • [48] Accuracy of Image Guidance Using Free-Breathing Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Monzen, Hajime
    Nakayama, Shinichi
    Mizote, Rika
    Oonishi, Yuuichi
    Kaneshige, Soichiro
    Sakamoto, Takashi
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [49] Optimal Image-Guidance Scenario With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors
    Yeung, Anamaria R.
    Li, Jonathan
    Shi, Wenyin
    Newlin, Heather
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Samant, Sanjiv
    Saito, Anneyuko
    Chvetsov, Alexei
    Liu, Chihray
    Palta, Jatinder
    Olivier, Kenneth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (03): : 276 - 280
  • [50] Positron emission tomography with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for primary staging of prostate cancer
    Hasa, Ergela
    Langbein, Thomas
    Eiber, Matthias
    Knorr, Karina
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (09): : 818 - 824