Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based unsupervised cluster analysis

被引:183
|
作者
Segar, Matthew W. [1 ]
Patel, Kershaw V. [1 ]
Ayers, Colby [1 ]
Basit, Mujeeb [1 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [2 ]
Willett, Duwayne [1 ]
Berry, Jarett [1 ]
Grodin, Justin L. [1 ]
Pandey, Ambarish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Phenomapping; Machine learning; Outcomes; SPIRONOLACTONE; PHENOTYPE; RISK; MORTALITY; TOPCAT;
D O I
10.1002/ejhf.1621
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To identify distinct phenotypic subgroups in a highly-dimensional, mixed-data cohort of individuals with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using unsupervised clustering analysis. Methods and results The study included all Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) participants from the Americas (n = 1767). In the subset of participants with available echocardiographic data (derivation cohort, n = 654), we characterized three mutually exclusive phenogroups of HFpEF participants using penalized finite mixture model-based clustering analysis on 61 mixed-data phenotypic variables. Phenogroup 1 had higher burden of co-morbidities, natriuretic peptides, and abnormalities in left ventricular structure and function; phenogroup 2 had lower prevalence of cardiovascular and non-cardiac co-morbidities but higher burden of diastolic dysfunction; and phenogroup 3 had lower natriuretic peptide levels, intermediate co-morbidity burden, and the most favourable diastolic function profile. In adjusted Cox models, participants in phenogroup 1 (vs. phenogroup 3) had significantly higher risk for all adverse clinical events including the primary composite endpoint, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. Phenogroup 2 (vs. phenogroup 3) was significantly associated with higher risk of HF hospitalization but a lower risk of atherosclerotic event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), and comparable risk of mortality. Similar patterns of association were also observed in the non-echocardiographic TOPCAT cohort (internal validation cohort, n = 1113) and an external cohort of patients with HFpEF [Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RELAX) trial cohort, n = 198], with the highest risk of adverse outcome noted in phenogroup 1 participants. Conclusions Machine learning-based cluster analysis can identify phenogroups of patients with HFpEF with distinct clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hypoxemia in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Omar, M.
    Omote, K.
    Sorimachi, H.
    Popovic, D.
    Kanwar, A.
    Alogna, A.
    Reddy, Y. N.
    Lim, K. G.
    Shah, S.
    Borlaug, B. B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [42] Obesity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction
    Wajahat, R
    Titova, I
    Rumbarger, LEK
    King, DL
    Maurer, MS
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (06) : S107 - S107
  • [43] Prognosis for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Jacob, Javier
    Herrero, Pablo
    Martin-Sanchez, Francisco Javier
    Llorens, Pere
    Gil, Victor
    Miro, Oscar
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 65 (03): : 300 - 301
  • [44] Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Camafort, Miguel
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2009, 209 (10): : 514 - 515
  • [45] Bioinformatics analysis for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Zhang, Wenxi
    Huo, Yunlong
    Tan, Wenchang
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2019, 33
  • [46] Phenomapping a Novel Classification System for Patients with Destination LVADs: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Cluster Analysis
    Hendren, Nicholas S.
    Segar, Matt
    Zhong, Lin
    Drazner, Mark H.
    Young, James B.
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    Pandey, Ambarish
    Grodin, Justin L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S11 - S11
  • [47] Differences in Cardiac Mechanics and Exercise Physiology Among Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Phenomapping Subgroups
    Dixon, Debra D.
    Beussink-Nelson, Lauren
    Deo, Rahul
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 193 : 102 - 110
  • [48] Treatment response to spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a machine learning- based analysis of two randomized controlled trials
    Kresoja, Karl-Patrik
    Unterhuber, Matthias
    Wachter, Rolf
    Rommel, Karl-Philipp
    Besler, Christian
    Shah, Sanjiv
    Thiele, Holger
    Edelmann, Frank
    Lurz, Philipp
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2023, 96
  • [49] Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Parameters-Based Phenogroups of Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Using an Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithm
    Chaikijurajai, Thanat
    Augusto, Silvio N.
    Engelman, Timothy
    Van Iterson, Erik H.
    Finet, J. Emanuel
    Tang, Wai Hong W.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [50] Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Benefit From Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction Guidelines
    Steahr, Gregg
    Kelly, Linda
    Moore, Meredith
    Hott, Brenda
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2015, 21 (08) : S73 - S74