Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based unsupervised cluster analysis

被引:183
|
作者
Segar, Matthew W. [1 ]
Patel, Kershaw V. [1 ]
Ayers, Colby [1 ]
Basit, Mujeeb [1 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [2 ]
Willett, Duwayne [1 ]
Berry, Jarett [1 ]
Grodin, Justin L. [1 ]
Pandey, Ambarish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Phenomapping; Machine learning; Outcomes; SPIRONOLACTONE; PHENOTYPE; RISK; MORTALITY; TOPCAT;
D O I
10.1002/ejhf.1621
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To identify distinct phenotypic subgroups in a highly-dimensional, mixed-data cohort of individuals with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using unsupervised clustering analysis. Methods and results The study included all Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) participants from the Americas (n = 1767). In the subset of participants with available echocardiographic data (derivation cohort, n = 654), we characterized three mutually exclusive phenogroups of HFpEF participants using penalized finite mixture model-based clustering analysis on 61 mixed-data phenotypic variables. Phenogroup 1 had higher burden of co-morbidities, natriuretic peptides, and abnormalities in left ventricular structure and function; phenogroup 2 had lower prevalence of cardiovascular and non-cardiac co-morbidities but higher burden of diastolic dysfunction; and phenogroup 3 had lower natriuretic peptide levels, intermediate co-morbidity burden, and the most favourable diastolic function profile. In adjusted Cox models, participants in phenogroup 1 (vs. phenogroup 3) had significantly higher risk for all adverse clinical events including the primary composite endpoint, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. Phenogroup 2 (vs. phenogroup 3) was significantly associated with higher risk of HF hospitalization but a lower risk of atherosclerotic event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), and comparable risk of mortality. Similar patterns of association were also observed in the non-echocardiographic TOPCAT cohort (internal validation cohort, n = 1113) and an external cohort of patients with HFpEF [Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RELAX) trial cohort, n = 198], with the highest risk of adverse outcome noted in phenogroup 1 participants. Conclusions Machine learning-based cluster analysis can identify phenogroups of patients with HFpEF with distinct clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Woolley, Rebecca J.
    Ceelen, Daan
    Ouwerkerk, Wouter
    Tromp, Jasper
    Figarska, Sylwia M.
    Anker, Stefan D.
    Dickstein, Kenneth
    Filippatos, Gerasimos
    Zannad, Faiez
    Marco, Metra
    Ng, Leong
    Samani, Nilesh
    van Veldhuisen, Dirk
    Lang, Chim
    Lam, Carolyn S.
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2021, 23 (06) : 983 - 991
  • [32] Longitudinal Trajectory-Based Classification of Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction: A Machine Learning Approach
    Romero, Erick
    Patel, Dev
    Cadeiras, Martin
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [33] Spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Sanchez-Sanchez, C.
    Mendoza-Ruiz de Zuazu, H. F.
    Formiga, F.
    Manzano, L.
    Ceresuela, L. M.
    Carrera-Izquierdo, M.
    Gonzalez Franco, A.
    Epelde-Gonzalo, F.
    Cerqueiro-Gonzalez, J. M.
    Montero-Perez-Barquero, M.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2015, 215 (06): : 301 - 307
  • [34] Hospitalisation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Nanayakkara, Shane
    Patel, Hitesh C.
    Kaye, David M.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 12
  • [35] Treatment of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Deswal A.
    Bozkurt B.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2008, 10 (6) : 516 - 528
  • [36] Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Poppe, Katrina K.
    Doughty, Robert N.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2014, 10 (03) : 503 - +
  • [37] Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Forman D.
    Gaziano J.M.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2009, 3 (5) : 311 - 312
  • [38] Spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Nunez, J.
    Nunez, E.
    Sanchis, J.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2016, 216 (02): : 111 - 111
  • [39] Hypoxaemia in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Omar, Massar
    Omote, Kazunori
    Sorimachi, Hidemi
    Popovic, Dejana
    Kanwar, Ardaas
    Alogna, Alessio
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Lim, Kaiser G.
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 (09) : 1593 - 1603
  • [40] Management of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Jasinska-Piadlo, Alicja
    Campbell, Patricia
    HEART, 2023, 109 (11) : 874 - 883