Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

被引:6
|
作者
Tzeis, Stylianos [1 ]
Asvestas, Dimitrios [1 ]
Moraitis, Nektarios [2 ]
Vardas, Emmanuel P. [1 ]
Mililis, Panagiotis [3 ]
Letsas, Konstantinos [3 ]
Kouvelas, Konstantinos [1 ]
Nikita, Konstantina S. [2 ]
Vardas, Panos [1 ]
机构
[1] Mitera Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hygeia Grp, Erithrou Stavrou 6, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Athens, Greece
[3] Evangelismos Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Electrophysiol Lab, Athens, Greece
来源
EUROPACE | 2021年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Electromagnetic interference; Smartwatch; Cardiac implantable electronic device;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa220
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Smartwatches and their chargers could be a possible source of EMI. We sought to assess whether the latest generation smartwatches and their chargers interfere with proper CIED function. Methods and results We included consecutive CIED recipients in two centres. We tested two latest generation smartwatches (Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch) and their charging cables for potential EMI. The testing was performed under continuous electrocardiogram recording and real-time device telemetry, with nominal and 'worst-case' settings. In vitro magnetic field measurements were performed to assess the emissions from the tested devices, initially in contact with the probe and then at a distance of 10 cm and 20 cm. In total, 171 patients with CIEDs (71.3% pacemakers-28.7% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) from five manufacturers were enrolled (63.2% males, 74.8 +/- 11.4 years), resulting in 684 EMI tests. No EMI was identified in any patient either under nominal or 'worst-case scenario' programming. The peak magnetic flux density emitted by the smartwatches was similar to the background noise level (0.81 mu T) even when in contact with the measuring probe. The respective values for the chargers were 4.696 mu T and 4.299 mu T for the Samsung and Apple chargers, respectively, which fell at the background noise level when placed at 20 cm and 10 cm, respectively. Conclusion Two latest generation smartwatches and their chargers resulted in no EMI in CIED recipients. The absence of EMI in conjunction with the extremely low intensity of magnetic fields emitted by these devices support the safety of their use by CIED patients.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 103
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sudden Death in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Tseng, Zian H.
    Hayward, Robert M.
    Clark, Nina M.
    Mulvanny, Christopher G.
    Colburn, Benjamin J.
    Ursell, Philip C.
    Olgin, Jeffrey E.
    Hart, Amy P.
    Moffatt, Ellen
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (08) : 1342 - 1350
  • [32] Cybersecurity: The need for data and patient safety with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Das, Subrat
    Siroky, Gregory P.
    Lee, Shawn
    Mehta, Davendra
    Suri, Ranjit
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (03) : 473 - 481
  • [33] Pulsed field ablation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: an ex vivo assessment of safety
    Lennerz, Carsten
    O'Connor, Matthew
    Schaarschmidt, Claudia
    Reents, Tilko
    Bourier, Felix
    Telishevska, Marta
    Lengauer, Sarah
    Popa, Miruna
    Wimbauer, Katharina
    Holmgren, Ellen
    Thoma, Mara
    Spitzauer, Lovis
    Bahlke, Fabian
    Krafft, Hannah
    Englert, Florian
    Knoll, Katharina
    Friedrich, Lena
    Blazek, Patrick
    Hessling, Gabriele
    Kolb, Christof
    Deisenhofer, Isabel
    Kottmaier, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [34] Safety verification of carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)
    Okano, Naoko
    Sakai, Makoto
    Shibuya, Kei
    Tsuda, Kazuhisa
    Kanzaki, Takao
    Sano, Masato
    Kaneko, Yoshiaki
    Ohno, Tatsuya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2022, 63 (01) : 122 - 127
  • [35] STRESS VASODILATOR EFFECTS ON PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND SAFETY IN THE MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENVIRONMENT
    Miller, Lauren
    Airapetov, Sergei
    Pillai, Ajay
    Kalahasty, Gautham
    Trankle, Cory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 1295 - 1295
  • [36] Can a Simple Flip Make a Difference in MRI Safety in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices?
    Litt, Harold I.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2019, 1 (03):
  • [37] Cybersecurity and cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Alexander, Bryce
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (06) : 315 - 317
  • [38] Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Khan, Khurrum
    Kim, Jitae A.
    Gurgu, Andra
    Khawaja, Muzamil
    Cozma, Dragos
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2022, 36 (04) : 763 - 775
  • [39] Cybersecurity and cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bryce Alexander
    Adrian Baranchuk
    [J]. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2020, 17 : 315 - 317
  • [40] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Maass, A. H.
    Hemels, M. E. W.
    Allaart, C. P.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 26 (12) : 584 - 590