Economic and technical feasibility studies: technologies for second generation biofuels

被引:22
|
作者
Mungodla, Sarah Gabashwediwe [1 ]
Linganiso, Linda Zikhona [2 ]
Mlambo, Sukoluhle [3 ]
Motaung, Tshwafo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zululand, Dept Chem, Fac Sci & Agr, Kwa Dlangezwa, South Africa
[2] Univ Zululand, Dept Chem, Kwa Dlangezwa, South Africa
[3] Univ Zululand, Dept Zool, Kwa Dlangezwa, South Africa
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Feasibility studies; Forecasting models; Second generation biofuel; Techno-economic studies; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; COMPARATIVE TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; FOOD WASTE; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; JATROPHA-CURCAS; FAST PYROLYSIS; WOODY BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1108/JEDT-07-2018-0111
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose In 2008, a number of Southern African countries cultivated about 900,000 ha of Jatropha, with a number of biodiesel plants ready for production; however, none of the projects succeeded. In 2014, KiOR advanced biofuel Energy Company in the USA announced bankruptcy due to incompetent technology. Studies disclose that the reasons for biofuel plants failure are not only due to lack of incentives and unclear policies but also due to lack of economic feasibility and low production yields. This paper aims to review the techno-economy assessment of second-generation biofuel technologies. The purpose of this paper is to summarize specific techno-economic indicators such as production cost, technology efficiency and process life cycle analysis for advanced biofuel technology and to narrate and illustrate a clear view of what requires assessment to deploy a feasible advanced biofuel technology. This study also reviews assessment of biomass supply chain, feedstock availability and site selection criteria. The review also elaborates on the use of different processes, forecasting and simulation-modeling tools used in different techno-economic analysis studies. The review provides guidance for conducting a technical and economic feasibility study for the advanced biofuels energy business. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this review is, therefore, to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility studies for the establishment of viable industrial scale production of second-generation biofuels. It does so by grouping studies based on technology selection, feedstock availability and suitability, process simulation and economies as well as technology environmental impact assessment. Findings In conclusion, techno-economic analysis tools offer researchers insight in terms of where their research and development should focus, to attain the most significant enhancement for the economics of a technology. The study patterns within the scope of techno-economics of advanced biofuel reveal that there is no generic answer as to which technology would be feasible at a commercial scale. It is therefore important to keep in mind that models can only simplify and give a simulation of reality to a certain extent. Nevertheless, reviewed studies do not reach the same results, but some results are logically similar. Originality/value The originality of this article specifically illustrates important technical and economic indicators that should be considered when conducting feasibility studies for advance biofuels.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 704
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What Is the Social Value of Second Generation Biofuels?
    Hertel, Thomas W.
    Steinbuks, Jevgenijs
    Tyner, Wallace E.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2016, 38 (04) : 599 - 617
  • [22] Gasification of Biomass to Second Generation Biofuels: A Review
    Guell, Berta Matas
    Sandquist, Judit
    Sorum, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (01):
  • [23] A Comprehensive Approach to the Characterization of Second Generation Biofuels
    Biagini, Enrico
    Simone, Marco
    Barontini, Federica
    Tognotti, Leonardo
    [J]. ICHEAP-11: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 32 : 853 - 858
  • [24] Second generation biofuels: Thermochemistry of glucose and fructose
    Osmont, A.
    Catoire, L.
    Bocanegra, P. Escot
    Goekalp, I.
    Thollas, B.
    Kozinski, J. A.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2010, 157 (06) : 1230 - 1234
  • [25] Microalgae: a renewable source for second generation biofuels
    Arumugam, M.
    Agarwal, A.
    Arya, M. C.
    Ahmed, Z.
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2011, 100 (08): : 1141 - 1142
  • [26] Paving the way to the production of second generation biofuels
    Veses, A.
    Garcia, T.
    [J]. BOLETIN DEL GRUPO ESPANOL DEL CARBON, 2016, (41): : 26 - 30
  • [27] Technical-economic and financial feasibility of new technologies in the energy refurbishment of residential buildings
    Iunco, Alberto
    Paduos, Simona
    Chiappero, Marco
    Corrado, Vincenzo
    Santarelli, Massimo
    [J]. 53RD AICARR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FROM NZEB TO ZEB: THE BUILDINGS OF THE NEXT DECADES FOR A HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2024, 523
  • [28] GASIFICATION OF BIOMASS TO SECOND GENERATION BIOFUELS: A REVIEW
    Guell, Berta Matas
    Sandquist, Judit
    Sorum, Lars
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY 2011, PTS A-C, 2012, : 1119 - 1129
  • [29] Second-generation biofuels need investment
    Cozier, Muriel
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2010, 4 (06): : 587 - 587
  • [30] How close are second-generation biofuels?
    Bacovsky, Dina
    Mabee, Warren
    Woergetter, Manfred
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2010, 4 (03): : 249 - 252