Conducting depression screenings in a community pharmacy: A pilot comparison of methods

被引:7
|
作者
Ballou, Jordan M. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chapman, April R. [2 ,6 ]
Roark, Angie M. [2 ,7 ]
Huie, Cathy H. [2 ]
McKee, Jerry [3 ,8 ]
Marciniak, Macary W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Brame Huie Pharm, North Wilkesboro, NC USA
[3] Community Care North Carolina, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Pharm, University, MS 38677 USA
[5] POB 1848,201 Faser Hall, University, MS 38677 USA
[6] Peoples Drug, Taylorsville, NC USA
[7] Wake Forest Baptist Hlth, Specialty Pharm, Operat, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] Ballad Hlth Woodridge Hosp, Psychiat, Johnson City, TN USA
关键词
community pharmacy; depression; mass screening; organization and administration; OLDER-ADULTS; CARE; PHQ-9;
D O I
10.1002/jac5.1156
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundDepression is one of the most common mental health disorders in the United States. Routine screening of all adult patients for depression is recommended, but current screening rates are in the single digits. Community pharmacists are the most accessible health care providers, making them uniquely positioned to screen patients for depression and, when necessary, refer patients to local health care providers. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare methods for administration of a depression screening tool in an independent, community pharmacy. MethodsFifty Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening questionnaires were distributed to participants through each of three different methods: (1) as a bag stuffer with written instructions at prescription pick-up, (2) personal ask with verbal instructions at prescription drop-off, or (3) one-on-one conversation with the pharmacist at prescription pick-up or during a previously scheduled medication therapy management appointment. ResultsThere was a difference in the participation rate among each of the three methods: 1/50 in the bag stuffer group, 36/50 in the personal ask group, and 40/50 in the interview group. Of the 77 participants, 18 required referral for additional treatment. Of the participants surveyed, 93% indicated that offering depression screening in a community pharmacy was a valuable service. The average amount of time spent with each participant was approximately 4 minutes. ConclusionAdministration of the PHQ-9 screening tool that involved direct pharmacist intervention elicited a higher response from participants than bag stuffers and may be an effective strategy to engage patients in a conversation regarding their mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Considering pharmacy workflow in the context of Australian community pharmacy: A pilot time and motion study
    Cavaye, Diana
    Lehnbom, Elin C.
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    El-Boustani, Elise
    Joshi, Rohina
    Webster, Ruth
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2018, 14 (12): : 1157 - 1162
  • [22] Comparison of patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services of postal pharmacy and community pharmacy
    Govender, Nishern
    Suleman, Fatima
    HEALTH SA GESONDHEID, 2019, 24
  • [23] Comparison of costs of community and mail service pharmacy
    Carroll, Norman V.
    Brusilovsky, Ilia
    York, Bryan
    Oscar, Robert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 45 (03) : 336 - 343
  • [24] Pharmacy- and community-based screenings for diabetes and cardiovascular conditions in high-risk individuals
    Snella, Kathleen A.
    Canales, Ann E.
    Irons, Brian K.
    Sleeper-Irons, Rebecca B.
    Villarreal, Maumi C.
    Levi-Derrick, Valerie E.
    Greens, R. Shane
    Jolly, Jamie L.
    Nelson, Arthur A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 46 (03) : 370 - 377
  • [26] Pharmacy Staff Opinions Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings in the Community Setting: Findings from a Brief Survey
    Law, Miranda G.
    Komura, Stephanie
    Murchison, Ann P.
    Pizzi, Laura T.
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2013, 6 (07): : 548 - 552
  • [27] COMPARISON OF PIPETTE AND SMEAR METHODS IN POPULATION SCREENINGS FOR CARCINOMA OF UTERINE CERVIX
    KLINKEN, L
    KOCH, F
    ALBRECHTSEN, R
    DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1972, 19 (04) : 138 - +
  • [28] Best practices for conducting and writing mixed methods research in social pharmacy
    Rao, Deepika
    Shiyanbola, Olayinka O.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2022, 18 (01): : 2184 - 2192
  • [29] Exploratory planning and implementation of a pilot pharmacogenetic program in a community pharmacy
    O'Connor, Shanna K.
    Ferreri, Stefanie P.
    Michaels, Natasha M.
    Greco, Angelo J.
    Viera, Anthony J.
    Faruki, Hawazin
    McLeod, Howard L.
    Roederer, Mary W.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2012, 13 (08) : 955 - 962
  • [30] Mental heatlh evaluation in community pharmacy: results of a pilot study
    Condinho, Monica
    Ramalhinho, Isabel
    Guarda, Ana
    Velho, Catarina Vaz
    Sinogas, Carlos
    Moniz, Margarida
    Rodrigues, Kevin
    Rodrigues, Catarina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (06) : 1741 - 1741