Best practices for conducting and writing mixed methods research in social pharmacy

被引:6
|
作者
Rao, Deepika [1 ]
Shiyanbola, Olayinka O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, Social & Adm Sci, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
关键词
Mixed methods; Pharmacy; Applications; Limitations; Recommendations; Integration; OLDER-ADULTS; INTEGRATION; VALIDATION; QUALITY; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Mixed method approaches are increasingly being used in social pharmacy research due to its potential to uncover insights that are not possible with separate quantitative and qualitative studies. Despite their increasing use, there are some limitations in these publications. Typically, specific mixed method designs are not chosen, quantitative and qualitative data are not systematically integrated, and the credibility or validity of the approach is not addressed. In this paper, we discuss mixed method designs and their applications in social pharmacy. Different integration techniques and legitimation types are detailed. We describe new methodological developments and provide examples from recent mixed method studies in social pharmacy. Finally, we also provide recommendations for planning, conducting, reporting, and evaluating mixed method studies. We suggest that researchers interested in conducting mixed method studies follow recommended guidelines and obtain training in mixed methods to ensure that rigorous mixed method studies are conducted in social and administrative pharmacy.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2192
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Content analysis methods for conducting research in social and administrative pharmacy
    Holdford, David
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2008, 4 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [2] Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences
    Dowding, Dawn
    [J]. QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 12 (04) : 541 - 545
  • [3] Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research
    Ann C. Klassen
    John Creswell
    Vicki L. Plano Clark
    Katherine Clegg Smith
    Helen I. Meissner
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2012, 21 : 377 - 380
  • [4] Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research
    Klassen, Ann C.
    Creswell, John
    Clark, Vicki L. Plano
    Smith, Katherine Clegg
    Meissner, Helen I.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (03) : 377 - 380
  • [5] Mixed methods: A methodological smorgasbord for social pharmacy research
    Aronson, Benjamin D.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2013, 9 (06): : 647 - 650
  • [6] Writing a Mixed Methods Report in Social Work Research
    Bronstein, Laura R.
    Kovacs, Pamela J.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2013, 23 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [7] Best practices: social research methods to inform biological conservation
    Crandall, Sharifa G.
    Ohayon, Jennifer L.
    de Wit, Luz A.
    Hammond, J. E.
    Melanson, Kate L.
    Moritsch, Monica M.
    Davenport, Rob
    Ruiz, Diana
    Keitt, Bradford
    Holmes, Nick D.
    Packard, Heath G.
    Bury, Jeffrey
    Gilbert, Gregory S.
    Parker, Ingrid M.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (01) : 6 - 23
  • [8] Conducting mixed methods research
    Taheri, Babak
    Okumus, Fevzi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (03) : 995 - 1004
  • [9] Integration in mixed-methods studies: existing practices, considerations and recommendations for pharmacy research
    Murry, Logan T.
    Fadare, Olajide O.
    Al-Khatib, Arwa
    Witry, Matthew J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 31 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [10] Designing and conducting mixed methods research
    Robinson, Priscilla
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 31 (04) : 388 - 388