Conducting depression screenings in a community pharmacy: A pilot comparison of methods

被引:7
|
作者
Ballou, Jordan M. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chapman, April R. [2 ,6 ]
Roark, Angie M. [2 ,7 ]
Huie, Cathy H. [2 ]
McKee, Jerry [3 ,8 ]
Marciniak, Macary W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Brame Huie Pharm, North Wilkesboro, NC USA
[3] Community Care North Carolina, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Pharm, University, MS 38677 USA
[5] POB 1848,201 Faser Hall, University, MS 38677 USA
[6] Peoples Drug, Taylorsville, NC USA
[7] Wake Forest Baptist Hlth, Specialty Pharm, Operat, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] Ballad Hlth Woodridge Hosp, Psychiat, Johnson City, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY | 2019年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
community pharmacy; depression; mass screening; organization and administration; OLDER-ADULTS; CARE; PHQ-9;
D O I
10.1002/jac5.1156
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundDepression is one of the most common mental health disorders in the United States. Routine screening of all adult patients for depression is recommended, but current screening rates are in the single digits. Community pharmacists are the most accessible health care providers, making them uniquely positioned to screen patients for depression and, when necessary, refer patients to local health care providers. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare methods for administration of a depression screening tool in an independent, community pharmacy. MethodsFifty Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening questionnaires were distributed to participants through each of three different methods: (1) as a bag stuffer with written instructions at prescription pick-up, (2) personal ask with verbal instructions at prescription drop-off, or (3) one-on-one conversation with the pharmacist at prescription pick-up or during a previously scheduled medication therapy management appointment. ResultsThere was a difference in the participation rate among each of the three methods: 1/50 in the bag stuffer group, 36/50 in the personal ask group, and 40/50 in the interview group. Of the 77 participants, 18 required referral for additional treatment. Of the participants surveyed, 93% indicated that offering depression screening in a community pharmacy was a valuable service. The average amount of time spent with each participant was approximately 4 minutes. ConclusionAdministration of the PHQ-9 screening tool that involved direct pharmacist intervention elicited a higher response from participants than bag stuffers and may be an effective strategy to engage patients in a conversation regarding their mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pilot Project to Implement a Community Pharmacy Medication Review Program
    Dupuis, Sebastien
    Turgeon, Nathalie
    Beauchesne, Marie-France
    CANADIAN PHARMACISTS JOURNAL, 2011, 144 (03) : 116 - 118
  • [32] EXPANDING PHARMACY TECHNICIAN ROLES IN THE COMMUNITY PHARMACIES: A PILOT PROJECT
    Huynh, Timmy
    Tomaszewski, Daniel
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (04): : E17 - E18
  • [33] Development and implementation of a Community Pharmacy " Bootcamp " activity - A pilot study
    Kiles, Tyler Marie
    Weaver, Terry
    Stallings, Amanda
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [34] Assessing feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up among older adults at community pharmacy: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Christopher, Christina Malini
    Blebil, Ali Qais
    Bhuvan, K. C.
    Alex, Deepa
    Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham Mohamed
    Ismail, Norhasimah
    Cheong, Mark Wing Loong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (04) : 843 - 853
  • [35] Community Pharmacy Professional Service Availability: An International Comparison
    Perepelkin, J. P.
    Ulrich, E. E.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2014, 10 (05): : E13 - E13
  • [36] Community Pharmacy Versus Mail Order: An Uneven Comparison
    Farley, Joel F.
    Urick, Benjamin Y.
    Schondelmeyer, Stephen W.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (06): : 724 - 725
  • [37] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CONDUCTING LABORATORY PROFICIENCY SURVEYS
    MARTINEK, RG
    BECKTEL, JM
    FORSTER, GF
    MORRISSEY, RA
    HEALTH LABORATORY SCIENCE, 1968, 5 (04) : 239 - +
  • [38] SCREENING OF COPD FROM THE COMMUNITY PHARMACY: PROTOCOL AND RESULTS OF THE PILOT STUDY
    Segovia Sanchez, Mireia
    Via Sosa, Ma Angels
    Trave Mercade, Pere
    March Pujol, Marian
    FARMACEUTICOS COMUNITARIOS, 2012, 4 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [39] A comparison of presentation methods for conducting youth juries
    Dowthwaite, Liz
    Vallejos, Elvira Perez
    Koene, Ansgar
    Cano, Monica
    Portillo, Virginia
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [40] Public's attitudes towards community pharmacy in Qatar: a pilot study
    El Hajj, Maguy Saffouh
    Salem, Samah
    Mansoor, Hend
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2011, 5 : 405 - 422