Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Blok, R. D. [1 ,2 ]
Hagemans, J. A. W. [3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [3 ,4 ]
Rothbarth, J. [3 ]
van der Bile, J. D. W. [5 ]
Lapid, O. [6 ]
Hompes, R. [1 ]
Tanis, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,Post Box 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, LEXOR,Ctr Expt & Mol Med,Oncode Inst, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Flevo Hosp, Dept Surg, Hosp Weg 1, Almere, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Abdominoperineal resection; Surgical flaps; Tissue transfer; Gluteal turnover flap; Perineal wound healing; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-02055-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of perineal wound morbidity. Perineal wound closure using autologous tissue flaps has been shown to be advantageous, but there is no consensus as to the optimal method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel gluteal turnover flap (GT-flap) without donor site scar for perineal closure after APR. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomised pilot study in two academic centres. Perineal reconstruction consisted of a unilateral subcutaneous GT-flap, followed by midline closure. Feasibility was defined as uncomplicated perineal wound healing at 30 days in at least five patients, and a maximum of two flap failures. Results Out of 17 potentially eligible patients, 10 patients underwent APR with GT-flap-assisted perineal wound closure. Seven patients had pre-operative radiotherapy. Median-added theatre time was 38 min (range 35-44 min). Two patients developed a superficial perineal wound dehiscence, most likely because of the excessive width of the skin island. Two other patients developed purulent discharge and excessive serosanguinous discharge, respectively, resulting in four complicated wounds at 30 days. No flap failure occurred, and no radiological or surgical reinterventions were performed. Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-12 days). Conclusions The GT-flap for routine perineal wound closure after APR seems feasible with limited additional theatre time, but success seems to depend on correct planning of the width of the flap. The potential for reducing perineal morbidity should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 759
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bobkiewicz, Adam
    Banasiewicz, Tomasz
    Krokowicz, Lukasz
    Paszkowski, Jacek
    Hermann, Jacek
    Malinger, Stanislaw
    Drews, Michal
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) : E18 - E18
  • [42] Perineal eventration after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: anatomical, surgical and clinico-pathological landmarks
    Moraru, Dan Cristian
    Scripcariu, Dragos Viorel
    Ferariu, Dan
    Scripcariu, Viorel
    Filip, Bogdan
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2020, 61 (04): : 1111 - 1119
  • [43] Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing after Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Milan Spasojevic
    Anthony B. Mariathasan
    Mariusz Goscinski
    Ebbe B. Thorgersen
    Arne M. Solbakken
    Hans-Petter Gullestad
    Truls Ryder
    Kjersti Flatmark
    Stein G. Larsen
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 1357 - 1365
  • [44] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1129 - 1139
  • [45] Metachronous carcinoma at the colostomy site after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer: a case report
    Choi, Young Sun
    Lee, Kil-young
    Park, Youn Young
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Lee, Jaeim
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 39 (02) : 175 - 177
  • [46] Port Site Metastases After a Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection of Rectal Cancer: Report of a Case
    Al-Saif, Osama H.
    Sengupta, Bodhisatwa
    Meshikhes, Abdul-Wahed N.
    SURGERY TODAY, 2011, 41 (03) : 412 - 414
  • [47] Port site metastases after a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer: Report of a case
    Osama H. Al-Saif
    Bodhisatwa Sengupta
    Abdul-Wahed N. Meshikhes
    Surgery Today, 2011, 41 : 412 - 414
  • [48] Perineal Closure after Abdominoperineal Resection Using a Pedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A Safe Alternative to Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
    Lakkis, Zaher
    Laydi, Maxime
    Paquette, Brice
    Turco, Celia
    Bouviez, Nicolas
    Manfredelli, Simone
    Doussot, Alexandre
    Pauchot, Julien
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (02) : E1 - E4
  • [49] Pseudoaneurysm of the inferior gluteal artery: An unusual complication after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Report of a case
    Nunoo-Mensah, Joseph W.
    Ritter, Manfred P.
    Wasserberg, Nir
    Ortega, Adrian
    Harrell, D.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 115 - 117
  • [50] Omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer does not reduce perineal wound complications: a Dutch snapshot study
    Blok, R. D.
    Musters, G. D.
    Borstlap, W. A. A.
    Bemelman, W. A.
    Tanis, P. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 6 - 6