Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Blok, R. D. [1 ,2 ]
Hagemans, J. A. W. [3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [3 ,4 ]
Rothbarth, J. [3 ]
van der Bile, J. D. W. [5 ]
Lapid, O. [6 ]
Hompes, R. [1 ]
Tanis, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,Post Box 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, LEXOR,Ctr Expt & Mol Med,Oncode Inst, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Flevo Hosp, Dept Surg, Hosp Weg 1, Almere, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Abdominoperineal resection; Surgical flaps; Tissue transfer; Gluteal turnover flap; Perineal wound healing; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-02055-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of perineal wound morbidity. Perineal wound closure using autologous tissue flaps has been shown to be advantageous, but there is no consensus as to the optimal method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel gluteal turnover flap (GT-flap) without donor site scar for perineal closure after APR. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomised pilot study in two academic centres. Perineal reconstruction consisted of a unilateral subcutaneous GT-flap, followed by midline closure. Feasibility was defined as uncomplicated perineal wound healing at 30 days in at least five patients, and a maximum of two flap failures. Results Out of 17 potentially eligible patients, 10 patients underwent APR with GT-flap-assisted perineal wound closure. Seven patients had pre-operative radiotherapy. Median-added theatre time was 38 min (range 35-44 min). Two patients developed a superficial perineal wound dehiscence, most likely because of the excessive width of the skin island. Two other patients developed purulent discharge and excessive serosanguinous discharge, respectively, resulting in four complicated wounds at 30 days. No flap failure occurred, and no radiological or surgical reinterventions were performed. Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-12 days). Conclusions The GT-flap for routine perineal wound closure after APR seems feasible with limited additional theatre time, but success seems to depend on correct planning of the width of the flap. The potential for reducing perineal morbidity should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 759
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Snapshot Study on the Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer
    Arthur R. Wijsmuller
    Patrick H. J. Hemmer
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 801 - 802
  • [22] Time to Chemotherapy After Abdominoperineal Resection: Comparison Between Primary Closure and Perineal Flap Reconstruction
    Althumairi, Azah A.
    Canner, Joseph K.
    Ahuja, Nita
    Sacks, Justin M.
    Safar, Bashar
    Efron, Jonathan E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (01) : 225 - 230
  • [23] Low incidence of perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
    Levic, Katarina
    von Rosen, Kasper
    Bulut, Orhan
    Bisgaard, Thue
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (07):
  • [24] Time to Chemotherapy After Abdominoperineal Resection: Comparison Between Primary Closure and Perineal Flap Reconstruction
    Azah A. Althumairi
    Joseph K. Canner
    Nita Ahuja
    Justin M. Sacks
    Bashar Safar
    Jonathan E. Efron
    World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 225 - 230
  • [25] Composite mesh and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flap for perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection: a novel technique
    Marios Papadakis
    Gunnar Hübner
    Marzena Bednarek
    Mohamed Arafkas
    Updates in Surgery, 2017, 69 : 109 - 111
  • [26] Composite mesh and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flap for perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection: a novel technique
    Papadakis, Marios
    Huebner, Gunnar
    Bednarek, Marzena
    Arafkas, Mohamed
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2017, 69 (01) : 109 - 111
  • [27] A Comparison of Oncological Outcomes After Abdominoperineal Resection Before And After The Implementation Of A Selective Perineal Flap Closure Programme
    Murphy, C.
    Stephens, I.
    O'Flanagan, G.
    O'Byrne, L.
    Reynolds, I.
    Ajmal, N.
    O'Sullivan, B.
    O'Neill, B.
    Deasy, J.
    Burke, J.
    McNamara, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 5) : S121 - S121
  • [28] Time to Chemotherapy after Abdominoperineal Resection: Comparison between Primary Closure versus Perineal Flap Reconstruction
    Althumairi, A.
    Canner, J.
    Safar, B.
    Fang, S.
    Ahuja, N.
    Sacks, J.
    Efron, J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S83 - S83
  • [29] Perineal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: Report of two cases
    Veenhof, Alexander A. F. A.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (08) : 1271 - 1274
  • [30] Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Arnar Hákonarson
    Nader Algethami
    Marie-Louise Lydrup
    Pamela Buchwald
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2022, 37 : 1029 - 1034