Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Blok, R. D. [1 ,2 ]
Hagemans, J. A. W. [3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [3 ,4 ]
Rothbarth, J. [3 ]
van der Bile, J. D. W. [5 ]
Lapid, O. [6 ]
Hompes, R. [1 ]
Tanis, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,Post Box 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, LEXOR,Ctr Expt & Mol Med,Oncode Inst, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Flevo Hosp, Dept Surg, Hosp Weg 1, Almere, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Abdominoperineal resection; Surgical flaps; Tissue transfer; Gluteal turnover flap; Perineal wound healing; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-02055-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of perineal wound morbidity. Perineal wound closure using autologous tissue flaps has been shown to be advantageous, but there is no consensus as to the optimal method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel gluteal turnover flap (GT-flap) without donor site scar for perineal closure after APR. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomised pilot study in two academic centres. Perineal reconstruction consisted of a unilateral subcutaneous GT-flap, followed by midline closure. Feasibility was defined as uncomplicated perineal wound healing at 30 days in at least five patients, and a maximum of two flap failures. Results Out of 17 potentially eligible patients, 10 patients underwent APR with GT-flap-assisted perineal wound closure. Seven patients had pre-operative radiotherapy. Median-added theatre time was 38 min (range 35-44 min). Two patients developed a superficial perineal wound dehiscence, most likely because of the excessive width of the skin island. Two other patients developed purulent discharge and excessive serosanguinous discharge, respectively, resulting in four complicated wounds at 30 days. No flap failure occurred, and no radiological or surgical reinterventions were performed. Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-12 days). Conclusions The GT-flap for routine perineal wound closure after APR seems feasible with limited additional theatre time, but success seems to depend on correct planning of the width of the flap. The potential for reducing perineal morbidity should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 759
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Hakonarson, Arnar
    Algethami, Nader
    Lydrup, Marie-Louise
    Buchwald, Pamela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (05) : 1029 - 1034
  • [32] Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer
    徐徕
    China Medical Abstracts(Surgery), 2012, 21 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [33] Perineal colostomy with antegrade continence enemas as an alternative after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Penninckx, F
    D'Hoore, A
    Bosch, AV
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2005, 130 (05): : 327 - 330
  • [34] Secondary implantation of an artificial sphincter after abdominoperineal resection and pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for rectal cancer
    Marchal, F
    Doucet, C
    Lechaux, D
    Lasser, P
    Lehur, PA
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2005, 29 (04): : 425 - 428
  • [35] Reply to "Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer," by Lakhbir Sandhu and George Chang
    Blok, Robin D.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (13) : 4051 - 4052
  • [36] Reply to “Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer,” by Lakhbir Sandhu and George Chang
    Robin D. Blok
    Pieter J. Tanis
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 4051 - 4052
  • [37] Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing after Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Spasojevic, Milan
    Mariathasan, Anthony B.
    Goscinski, Mariusz
    Thorgersen, Ebbe B.
    Solbakken, Arne M.
    Gullestad, Hans-Petter
    Ryder, Truls
    Flatmark, Kjersti
    Larsen, Stein G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 1357 - 1365
  • [38] Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Levy, Samuel
    Serror, Kevin
    Boccara, David
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (12) : 3773 - 3773
  • [39] Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Samuel Levy
    Kevin Serror
    David Boccara
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 3773 - 3773
  • [40] Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Is the Pelvic Drain Externalization Site an Independent Risk Factor for Perineal Wound Healing?
    Pramateftakis, M. G.
    Raptis, D.
    Kanellos, D.
    Christoforidis, E.
    Tsoulfas, G.
    Kanellos, I.
    Lazaridis, Ch.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2012