Forage management practices in Florida beef cattle production by size of operation

被引:0
|
作者
Wade, MA [1 ]
Minton, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Indian River Res & Educ Ctr, Food & Res Econ Dept, Ft Pierce, FL 34945 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Pasture improvement has long been a way to increase the carrying capacity on Florida ranches. Herd sizes can be increased through intensive grazing and aggressive pasture management, or current herds can be maintained on fewer hectares when denser, more nutrient rich forages are available. The objective of this research is to evaluate current attitudes, cultural and management practices, and economic influences on pasture improvement in Florida by size of operation. Data from 271 completed questionnaires received from cattle operations throughout the state was aggregated and sorted by size of operation, as determined by number of beef cows, into small, medium, and large categories. Statistical significance between size groups was tested using a chi-square Goodness-of-Fit Test and analysis of variance. Base survey statistics, such as number of animal and hectares in operation, were significantly different between size groups, while production statistics like number of calves per cow, stocking rate, and cows per bun were not statistically different. Most pasture management practices, such as chemical and fertilizer application practices and costs were not significantly different between operational size groups, though overall pasture renovation costs per hectare were different. The impact of cattle and chemical prices on die decision to invest in pasture improvement, cattle and chemical cross elasticities, were significantly different, with all except the large group having elasticities <1. These results indicate that while small, medium, and large producers differ in overall pasture renovation costs, generally, differences in individual pasture management practices and operational costs are not statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of Foot and Leg Structure for Beef Cattle in Forage-Based Production Systems
    Sitz, Taylre
    DelCurto-Wyffels, Hannah
    Van Emon, Megan
    Wyffels, Sam
    Retallick, Kelli
    Tarpoff, Esther
    Kangas, Kurt
    DelCurto, Tim
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [32] SIMULATING DIFFERENCES IN NET RETURNS FROM BEEF-PRODUCTION UNDER ALTERNATIVE FORAGE SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    ANGIRASA, AK
    SHUMWAY, CR
    CARTWRIGHT, TC
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (02) : 99 - 116
  • [33] FORAGE MAIZE IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    WILKINSON, JM
    WILLIAMS, TE
    JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH GRASSLAND SOCIETY, 1975, 30 (01): : 86 - 87
  • [34] BEEF-FORAGE PRODUCTION MODELING
    LOEWER, OJ
    PARSCH, LD
    ARKANSAS FARM RESEARCH, 1988, 37 (05): : 7 - 7
  • [35] The Relevancy of Forage Quality to Beef Production
    Phillips, W. A.
    Horn, G. W.
    Cole, N. A.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2011, 51 (02) : 410 - 419
  • [36] Agro-ecology research to develop sustainable cattle production practices for Florida
    Capece, JC
    Mozaffari, M
    SOIL AND CROP SCIENCE SOCIETY OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 56 : 131 - 135
  • [37] Malt sprouts as a supplement for forage fed beef cattle
    Creasy, ME
    Gunter, SA
    Beck, PA
    Weyers, JS
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2001, 20 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [38] ALL-FORAGE DIETS FOR FINISHING BEEF CATTLE
    OLTJEN, RR
    RUMSEY, TS
    PUTNAM, PA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1971, 32 (02) : 327 - &
  • [39] BEEF-CATTLE AND FORAGE BUDGETS FOR WESTERN ARKANSAS
    HALBROOK, WA
    GREASER, G
    SPAULDING, B
    ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION SPECIAL REPORTS, 1977, (57): : 1 - 62
  • [40] BEEF-CATTLE AND FORAGE BUDGETS FOR WESTERN ARKANSAS
    SMITH, O
    MAY, R
    HALBROOK, WA
    ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION SPECIAL REPORTS, 1977, (38): : 1 - 85