Forage management practices in Florida beef cattle production by size of operation

被引:0
|
作者
Wade, MA [1 ]
Minton, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Indian River Res & Educ Ctr, Food & Res Econ Dept, Ft Pierce, FL 34945 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Pasture improvement has long been a way to increase the carrying capacity on Florida ranches. Herd sizes can be increased through intensive grazing and aggressive pasture management, or current herds can be maintained on fewer hectares when denser, more nutrient rich forages are available. The objective of this research is to evaluate current attitudes, cultural and management practices, and economic influences on pasture improvement in Florida by size of operation. Data from 271 completed questionnaires received from cattle operations throughout the state was aggregated and sorted by size of operation, as determined by number of beef cows, into small, medium, and large categories. Statistical significance between size groups was tested using a chi-square Goodness-of-Fit Test and analysis of variance. Base survey statistics, such as number of animal and hectares in operation, were significantly different between size groups, while production statistics like number of calves per cow, stocking rate, and cows per bun were not statistically different. Most pasture management practices, such as chemical and fertilizer application practices and costs were not significantly different between operational size groups, though overall pasture renovation costs per hectare were different. The impact of cattle and chemical prices on die decision to invest in pasture improvement, cattle and chemical cross elasticities, were significantly different, with all except the large group having elasticities <1. These results indicate that while small, medium, and large producers differ in overall pasture renovation costs, generally, differences in individual pasture management practices and operational costs are not statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of beef cattle management practices for planning beef quality assurance education
    Duffey, L. M.
    Paterson, J. A.
    Peterson, J. E.
    King, M. C.
    Rolfe, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 : 116 - 116
  • [22] Management practices and constraints of beef cattle production in communal areas of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa
    Molefi, S. H.
    Mbajiorgu, C. A.
    Antwi, M. A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01) : 187 - 192
  • [23] Phenotypic characterization of beef cattle breeds and production practices in Liberia
    Arthur Bob Karnuah
    Gregory Dunga
    Arthur Wennah
    Walter T. Wiles
    Edmond Greaves
    Roland Varkpeh
    Richard Osei-Amponsah
    Paul Boettcher
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1287 - 1294
  • [24] Best production practices for improvement of Beef Cattle carcass quality
    Amaral, Thais B.
    Fernandes, Arthur Francisco Araujo
    Rosa, Guilherme J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 384 - 384
  • [25] Practices of traditional beef farmers in their production and marketing of cattle in Zambia
    Chisoni Mumba
    Barbara Häsler
    John B. Muma
    Musso Munyeme
    Doreen Chilolo Sitali
    Eystein Skjerve
    Karl M. Rich
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 49 - 62
  • [26] Phenotypic characterization of beef cattle breeds and production practices in Liberia
    Karnuah, Arthur Bob
    Dunga, Gregory
    Wennah, Arthur
    Wiles, Walter T.
    Greaves, Edmond
    Varkpeh, Roland
    Osei-Amponsah, Richard
    Boettcher, Paul
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2018, 50 (06) : 1287 - 1294
  • [27] Practices of traditional beef farmers in their production and marketing of cattle in Zambia
    Mumba, Chisoni
    Hasler, Barbara
    Muma, John B.
    Munyeme, Musso
    Sitali, Doreen Chilolo
    Skjerve, Eystein
    Rich, Karl M.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2018, 50 (01) : 49 - 62
  • [28] USING MANAGEMENT TO ALTER FORAGE QUALITY AND BEEF-PRODUCTION
    COLEMAN, SW
    HORN, FP
    OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH REPORT, 1978, (NP-76): : 68 - 72
  • [29] CONTROL OF BEEF CATTLE FORAGE SUPPLEMENT INTAKE
    HENTGES, JF
    ADAMS, JR
    MOORE, JE
    OLTJEN, RR
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1967, 26 (01) : 208 - &
  • [30] Cattle-Related Injuries and Farm Management Practices on Kentucky Beef Cattle Farms
    Browning, S. R.
    Westneat, S. C.
    Sanderson, W. T.
    Reed, D. B.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, 2013, 19 (01): : 37 - 49