Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of container-based single-family housing in Canada: A case study

被引:44
|
作者
Dara, Chinyere [1 ]
Hachem-Vermette, Caroline [1 ]
Assefa, Getachew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, SECDL, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, PF 3197,2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Shipping container; Passive solar design; Environmental impacts; Sensitivity analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; BUILDINGS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; ENVELOPE; SUBSTITUTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106332
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This research presents an early-design analysis of single-family housing located in Calgary, Canada; and combines energy analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and life-cycle costing (LCC), to investigate the life cycle impacts associated with repurposing upcycled containers into modular housing. The study considers four case studies; container and lightwood designed to code specifications, both serving as base models and two improved models of container and lightwood, designed by incorporating energy efficiency measures and passive solar design standards. The life cycle assessment results for the code cases clearly show that majority of the life cycle environmental impacts (95%) occur at the use and operation phase, followed by the pre-use contributing 4%, and less than 1% at the end of life. For the improved cases, results show similar findings as the use and operation phase contributes approximately 85% impact, however, a higher pre-use impact of 12% is reported. Over the 50 years lifespan, the comparative life cycle impacts show only 3% difference when comparing container to lightwood cases. Sensitivity analysis show that utilizing Scenario 100:0 (container code-cut-of-method) in housing can result in a substantial amount of avoided impact about 46 (t CO2 eq) and (538 GJ) 149,444 kWh energy savings as compared to Scenario 0:100 (improved container - end of life recycling). Approximately 10% life cycle cost reduction is realized with the improved cases compared to code cases. This study proves the potentials for repurposing container for long-term usage as a building system, thereby meeting affordable housing needs with less environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment of a typical European single-family residence and its flood related repairs
    Hennequin, Thomas
    Dong, Yan
    Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Karsten
    Sorup, Hjalte Jomo Danielsen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 : 1334 - 1344
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation
    Strazza, Carlo
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Costamagna, Paola
    Gallo, Michela
    Brignole, Emma
    Girdinio, Paola
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 : 64 - 77
  • [33] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives
    Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Tanguy, Audrey
    Amor, Ben
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 197
  • [34] Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing
    Arulnathan, Vivek
    Heidari, Mohammad Davoud
    Doyon, Maurice
    Li, Eric P. H.
    Pelletier, Nathan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [35] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing for the Production of Hydrangeas in Antioquia-Colombia
    Arenas, Cindy Natalia
    Bello, Ana Patricia
    Molina, Nicolas Fernando
    Botero, Jaime Leon
    Betancur, Mariluz
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing as Supporting Tools for EVs Lightweight Design
    Zanchi, Laura
    Delogu, Massimo
    Ierides, Marcos
    Vasiliadis, Harilaos
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING 2016, 2016, 52 : 335 - 348
  • [37] A Case Study by Life Cycle Assessment
    Li, Shuyun
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, AND POWER ENGINEERING I, 2017, 1839
  • [38] Integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) in the early phases of aircraft structural design: an elevator case study
    Calado, Elcin Aleixo
    Leite, Marco
    Silva, Arlindo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (12): : 2091 - 2110
  • [39] Integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) in the early phases of aircraft structural design: an elevator case study
    Elcin Aleixo Calado
    Marco Leite
    Arlindo Silva
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 2091 - 2110
  • [40] Plant and equipment acquisition: a life cycle costing case study
    Robinson, J.
    [J]. Facilities, 1996, 14 (5-6)