Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives

被引:22
|
作者
Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq [1 ]
Lavoie, Patrick [2 ]
Tanguy, Audrey [1 ,3 ]
Amor, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Civil & Bldg Engn, Interdisciplinary Res Lab Sustainable Engn & Ecod, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] FPInnovations, Quebec City, PQ G1P 4R4, Canada
[3] CNRS, UMR 5600, UdL, EVS,Ecole Mines St Etienne, 158 Cours Fauriel, F-42023 St Etienne, France
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Attributional; Consequential; LCA; LCC; LCSA; CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER; ASSESSMENT LCA; WOOD PRODUCTS; SECTOR; CHALLENGES; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107836
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings are accountable for much of the resource consumption and CO2 emissions generated from human activities. Nonetheless, the focus of building life cycle assessment (LCA) studies to evaluate the environmental footprint are more commonly adopted in an attributional approach. Nevertheless, understanding a direct and indirect consequences in larger system using consequential approach is also needed for policy-making. Rather small body of existing literature has been found on the implementation of consequential LCA and life cycle costing (LCC) in the building sector. In this study, attributional and consequential approach are performed for hybrid wood multistorey building. The results showed that with attributional approach, the phase that contributed the environmental impacts the most in climate change category is the production phase yet it became the use phase if consequential approach is used. By performing consequential LCA-LCC the possible hidden impacts can be uncovered and sufficient insights into the indirect impacts can be seen, thereby offering stakeholders the opportunity to avoid such future consequences.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of an apartment building: comparison of an attributional and consequential approach
    Buyle, Matthias
    Braet, Johan
    Audenaert, Amaryllis
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 62 : 132 - 140
  • [2] An attributional and consequential life cycle assessment of substituting concrete with bricks
    Kua, Harn Wei
    Kamath, Susmita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 81 : 190 - 200
  • [3] Attributional or consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A matter of social responsibility
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Thoma, Greg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 305 - 314
  • [4] Attributional and consequential life cycle inventory assessment of recycling copper slag as building material in Singapore
    Kua, Harn-wei
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2013, 35 (04) : 510 - 520
  • [5] Relevance of attributional and consequential life cycle assessment for society and decision support
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4
  • [6] Coupling attributional and consequential life cycle assessment: A matter of social responsibility
    Brander, Matthew
    Burritt, Roger L.
    Christ, Katherine L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 : 514 - 521
  • [7] Opportunities of consequential and attributional modelling in life cycle assessment of wastewater and sludge management
    Heimersson, Sara
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    Ekvall, Tomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 222 : 242 - 251
  • [8] Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Schaubroeck, Simon
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Brandao, Miguel
    Benetto, Enrico
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [9] An attributional life cycle assessment for an Italian residential multifamily building
    Vitale, Pierluca
    Arena, Umberto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 39 (23) : 3033 - 3045
  • [10] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    J. Mason Earles
    Anthony Halog
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 445 - 453