Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing

被引:8
|
作者
Arulnathan, Vivek [1 ]
Heidari, Mohammad Davoud [1 ]
Doyon, Maurice [2 ]
Li, Eric P. H. [3 ]
Pelletier, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fipke Ctr Innovat Res, Food Syst PRISM Lab, FIP 226, Okanagan Campus,3247 Univ Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Laval Univ, Fac Agr & Food Sci, Paul Comtois, Bldg 2425,Rue Agr, Local 4418-A, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia Okanagan, Fac Management, EME 4125,1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
sustainability assessment; life cycle thinking; life cycle costing; economic indicators; economic assessment; MILK-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; TRIPLE BOTTOM-LINE; SOCIOECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY; EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; RISK-MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; THINKING; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.3390/su15010013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010-2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories-profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy-each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment
    Wood, Richard
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09): : 1710 - 1721
  • [2] Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment
    Richard Wood
    Edgar G. Hertwich
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1710 - 1721
  • [3] Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources
    Rapa, Mattia
    Gobbi, Laura
    Ruggieri, Roberto
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
  • [4] Life cycle costing as part of a life cycle sustainability assessment of products: methodology and case studies
    Bachmann, Till M.
    van der Kamp, Jonathan
    Bianchi, Marco
    Pihkola, Hanna
    del Oso, Mateo Saavedra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (10): : 1863 - 1879
  • [5] Environmental and economic assessment of gasification wastewater treatment by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    Cantarini, Federica
    Zueva, Svetlana
    Amato, Alessia
    Morico, Barbara
    Beolchini, Francesca
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    Veglio, Francesco
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [6] Economic sustainability assessment of Mediterranean crops: A comparative Life Cycle Costing (LCC) analysis
    Spada, Emanuele
    Stillitano, Teodora
    Falcone, Giacomo
    Iofrida, Nathalie
    Gulisano, Giovanni
    De Luca, Anna Irene
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [7] THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE COSTING IN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNOLOGIES
    Janik, Agnieszka
    [J]. ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 677 - 684
  • [8] From Life Cycle Costing to Economic Life Cycle AssessmentIntroducing an Economic Impact Pathway
    Neugebauer, Sabrina
    Forin, Silvia
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [9] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Bhochhibhoya, Silu
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Achten, Wouter M. J.
    Maskey, Ramesh Kumar
    Zanetti, Michela
    Cavalli, Raffaele
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11): : 1851 - 1863
  • [10] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Silu Bhochhibhoya
    Massimo Pizzol
    Wouter M. J. Achten
    Ramesh Kumar Maskey
    Michela Zanetti
    Raffaele Cavalli
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1851 - 1863