Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Zhou, Jie [1 ]
Cao, Weihua [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dose-response relationship; double robustness; inverse probability weighting; outcome regression; propensity function; propensity score; stratification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BODY-COMPOSITION; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280212452333
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is mostly concerned with binary or categorical exposures, even though exposures of a quantitative nature are frequently encountered in epidemiologic research. In this article, we review the available methods for estimating the dose-response curve for a quantitative exposure, which include ordinary regression based on an outcome regression model, inverse propensity weighting and stratification based on a propensity function model, and an augmented inverse propensity weighting method that is doubly robust with respect to the two models. We note that an outcome regression model often imposes an implicit constraint on the dose-response curve, and propose a flexible modeling strategy that avoids constraining the dose-response curve. We also propose two new methods: a weighted regression method that combines ordinary regression with inverse propensity weighting and a stratified regression method that combines ordinary regression with stratification. The proposed methods are similar to the augmented inverse propensity weighting method in the sense of double robustness, but easier to implement and more generally applicable. The methods are illustrated with an obstetric example and compared in simulation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 335
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Causal dynamic inference
    Alexander Bochman
    Dov M. Gabbay
    [J]. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 66 : 231 - 256
  • [42] Causal inference for clinicians
    Stovitz, Steven D.
    Shrier, Ian
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (03) : 109 - 112
  • [43] RESTRICTED CAUSAL INFERENCE
    KLOPOTEK, MA
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING '94, VOL I: TECHNOLOGY AND FOUNDATIONS, 1994, 51 : 342 - 347
  • [44] Causal inference in cplint
    Riguzzi, Fabrizio
    Cota, Giuseppe
    Bellodi, Elena
    Zese, Riccardo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2017, 91 : 216 - 232
  • [45] Polydesigns and causal inference
    Li, Fan
    Frangakis, Constantine E.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [46] Entropic Causal Inference
    Kocaoglu, Murat
    Dimakis, Alexandros G.
    Vishwanath, Sriram
    Hassibi, Babak
    [J]. THIRTY-FIRST AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 1156 - 1162
  • [47] Causal inference in perception
    Shams, Ladan
    Beierholm, Ulrik R.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (09) : 425 - 432
  • [48] ON THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    SCHWARTZ, GG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 126 (01) : 157 - 157
  • [49] A Survey on Causal Inference
    Yao, Liuyi
    Chu, Zhixuan
    Li, Sheng
    Li, Yaliang
    Gao, Jing
    Zhang, Aidong
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, 2021, 15 (05)
  • [50] The only thing that can stop bad causal inference is good causal inference
    Rohrer, Julia M.
    Schmukle, Stefan C.
    McElreath, Richard
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 45