Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Zhou, Jie [1 ]
Cao, Weihua [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dose-response relationship; double robustness; inverse probability weighting; outcome regression; propensity function; propensity score; stratification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BODY-COMPOSITION; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280212452333
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is mostly concerned with binary or categorical exposures, even though exposures of a quantitative nature are frequently encountered in epidemiologic research. In this article, we review the available methods for estimating the dose-response curve for a quantitative exposure, which include ordinary regression based on an outcome regression model, inverse propensity weighting and stratification based on a propensity function model, and an augmented inverse propensity weighting method that is doubly robust with respect to the two models. We note that an outcome regression model often imposes an implicit constraint on the dose-response curve, and propose a flexible modeling strategy that avoids constraining the dose-response curve. We also propose two new methods: a weighted regression method that combines ordinary regression with inverse propensity weighting and a stratified regression method that combines ordinary regression with stratification. The proposed methods are similar to the augmented inverse propensity weighting method in the sense of double robustness, but easier to implement and more generally applicable. The methods are illustrated with an obstetric example and compared in simulation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 335
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introduction to Causal Inference
    Spirtes, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2010, 11 : 1643 - 1662
  • [32] Causal dynamic inference
    Bochman, Alexander
    Gabbay, Dov M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 66 (1-4) : 231 - 256
  • [33] NONEXPERIMENTAL CAUSAL INFERENCE
    PAISLEY, MB
    PAISLEY, WJ
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1971, 35 (03) : 478 - &
  • [34] ON THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    KARHAUSEN, LR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 126 (03) : 556 - 557
  • [35] Causal inference in pharmacoepidemiology
    Pazzagli, Laura
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Hernan, Miguel
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 414 - 415
  • [36] ON THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    WEED, DL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (06) : 965 - 979
  • [37] Causal Inference by Compression
    Budhathoki, Kailash
    Vreeken, Jilles
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2016, : 41 - 50
  • [38] Ancestral Causal Inference
    Magliacane, Sara
    Claassen, Tom
    Mooij, Joris M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [39] Improving causal inference
    Ebrahim, Shah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 363 - 366
  • [40] Interventions and causal inference
    Eberhardt, Frederick
    Scheines, Richard
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2007, 74 (05) : 981 - 995