A Survey on Causal Inference

被引:209
|
作者
Yao, Liuyi [1 ]
Chu, Zhixuan [2 ]
Li, Sheng [2 ]
Li, Yaliang [3 ]
Gao, Jing [4 ]
Zhang, Aidong [5 ]
机构
[1] Alibaba Grp, 969 West Wen Yi Rd, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Georgia, 415 Boyd Grad Studies Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Alibaba Grp, 500 108th Ave NE,Suite800, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, 465 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, 85 Engineers Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Treatment effect estimation; Representation learning; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; MATCHING METHODS; BIAS; ADJUSTMENTS; STRATEGIES; DIAGRAMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1145/3444944
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy, and economics, for decades. Nowadays, estimating causal effect from observational data has become an appealing research direction owing to the large amount of available data and low budget requirement, compared with randomized controlled trials. Embraced with the rapidly developed machine learning area, various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of causal inference methods under the potential outcome framework, one of the well-known causal inference frameworks. The methods are divided into two categories depending on whether they require all three assumptions of the potential outcome framework or not. For each category, both the traditional statistical methods and the recent machine learning enhanced methods are discussed and compared. The plausible applications of these methods are also presented, including the applications in advertising, recommendation, medicine, and so on. Moreover, the commonly used benchmark datasets as well as the open-source codes are also summarized, which facilitate researchers and practitioners to explore, evaluate and apply the causal inference methods.
引用
收藏
页数:46
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey on causal inference for recommendation
    Luo, Huishi
    Zhuang, Fuzhen
    Xie, Ruobing
    Zhu, Hengshu
    Wang, Deqing
    An, Zhulin
    Xu, Yongjun
    [J]. INNOVATION, 2024, 5 (02):
  • [2] Graphical Causal Models for Survey Inference
    Schuessler, Julian
    Selb, Peter
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [3] Causal inference in the medical domain: a survey
    Wu, Xing
    Peng, Shaoqi
    Li, Jingwen
    Zhang, Jian
    Sun, Qun
    Li, Weimin
    Qian, Quan
    Liu, Yue
    Guo, Yike
    [J]. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 54 (06) : 4911 - 4934
  • [4] ANALYTIC OR CAUSAL INFERENCE FROM SURVEY DATA
    KOOP, JC
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1985, 41 (02) : 586 - 586
  • [5] Causal Inference in Recommender Systems: A Survey and Future Directions
    Gao, Chen
    Zheng, Yu
    Wang, Wenjie
    Feng, Fuli
    He, Xiangnan
    Li, Yong
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 42 (04)
  • [6] Causal Inference Meets Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
    Jiao, Licheng
    Wang, Yuhan
    Liu, Xu
    Li, Lingling
    Liu, Fang
    Ma, Wenping
    Guo, Yuwei
    Chen, Puhua
    Yang, Shuyuan
    Hou, Biao
    [J]. RESEARCH, 2024, 7
  • [7] THEORY AND PRACTICE IN NONPROBABILITY SURVEYS PARALLELS BETWEEN CAUSAL INFERENCE AND SURVEY INFERENCE
    Mercer, Andrew W.
    Kreuter, Frauke
    Keeter, Scott
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2017, 81 : 250 - 271
  • [8] Causal Inference
    Kuang, Kun
    Li, Lian
    Geng, Zhi
    Xu, Lei
    Zhang, Kun
    Liao, Beishui
    Huang, Huaxin
    Ding, Peng
    Miao, Wang
    Jiang, Zhichao
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [9] CAUSAL INFERENCE
    ROTHMAN, KJ
    LANES, S
    ROBINS, J
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 555 - 556
  • [10] Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them
    Rohrer, Julia M.
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2024, 18 (03)