Detection and quantification of exhaled volatile organic compounds in mechanically ventilated patients - comparison of two sampling methods

被引:11
|
作者
van Oort, Pouline M. P. [1 ]
White, Iain R. [2 ,3 ]
Ahmed, Waqar [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Craig [2 ]
Bannard-Smith, Jonathan [6 ]
Felton, Timothy [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bos, Lieuwe D. [1 ]
Goodacre, Royston [7 ]
Dark, Paul [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Fowler, Stephen J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat Acad Med Ctr AMC, Dept Intens Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Inst Biotechnol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Nova Gorica, Lab Environm & Life Sci, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Biol Sci, Div Infect Immun & Resp Med, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Liverpool, Inst Integrat Biol, Dept Biochem, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS-SPECTROMETRY; RETENTION INDEXES; BREATH ANALYSIS; CONSTITUENTS; METABOLOMICS; KOVATS; L;
D O I
10.1039/c9an01134j
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Exhaled breath analysis is a promising new diagnostic tool, but currently no standardised method for sampling is available in mechanically ventilated patients. We compared two breath sampling methods, first using an artificial ventilator circuit, then in "real life" in mechanically ventilated patients on the intensive care unit. In the laboratory circuit, a 24-component synthetic-breath volatile organic compound (VOC) mixture was injected into the system as air was sampled: (A) through a port on the exhalation limb of the circuit and (B) through a closed endo-bronchial suction catheter. Sorbent tubes were used to collect samples for analysis by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Realistic mechanical ventilation rates and breath pressure-volume loops were established and method detection limits (MDLs) were calculated for all VOCs. Higher yields of VOCs were retrieved using the closed suction catheter; however, for several VOCs MDLs were compromised due to the background signal associated with plastic and rubber components in the catheters. Different brands of suction catheter were compared. Exhaled VOC data from 40 patient samples collected at two sites were then used to calculate the proportion of data analysed above the MDL. The relative performance of the two methods differed depending on the VOC under study and both methods showed sensitivity towards different exhaled VOCs. Furthermore, method performance differed depending on recruitment site, as the centres were equipped with different brands of respiratory equipment, an important consideration for the design of multicentre studies investigating exhaled VOCs in mechanically ventilated patients.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 231
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of Clostridioides difficile infection by assessment of exhaled breath volatile organic compounds
    John, Teny M.
    Shrestha, Nabin K.
    Hasan, Leen
    Pappan, Kirk
    Birch, Owen
    Grove, David
    Boyle, Billy
    Allsworth, Max
    Shrestha, Priyanka
    Procop, Gary W.
    Dweik, Raed A.
    JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (02)
  • [22] Comparison of two methods to assess blood CO2 equilibration curve in mechanically ventilated patients
    Cavaliere, F
    Giovannini, N
    Chiarla, C
    Conti, G
    Pennisi, MA
    Montini, L
    Gaspari, R
    Proietti, R
    RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY, 2005, 146 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [23] Comparison of two methods for measuring tidal volumes in patients mechanically ventilated with helium-oxygen mixtures
    Ball, JAS
    Rhodes, A
    Grounds, RM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (02) : 359P - 359P
  • [24] Volatile organic compounds: Sampling methods and their worldwide profile in ambient air
    Kumar, Anuj
    Viden, Ivan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 131 (1-3) : 301 - 321
  • [25] Volatile Organic Compounds: Sampling Methods and Their Worldwide Profile in Ambient Air
    Anuj Kumar
    Ivan Víden
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 131 : 301 - 321
  • [26] A comparison of sampling and analysis methods for low-ppbC levels of volatile organic compounds in ambient air
    Daughtrey, EH
    Oliver, KD
    Adams, JR
    Kronmiller, KG
    Lonneman, WA
    McClenny, WA
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2001, 3 (01): : 166 - 174
  • [27] New volatile organic compounds from the exhaled breath of active tuberculosis patients
    Mpolokang, Atlang Gild.
    Setlhare, Tlotlo Cassandra.
    Bhattacharyya, Somnath
    Chimowa, George
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [28] Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in exhaled breath in patients with lung cancer (LC)
    Jareno, J.
    Munoz, M. A.
    Maldonado, J. A.
    Carrillo, B.
    Rodriguez Trigo, G.
    Civera, C.
    Aguilar, A.
    Caamano, M.
    Gutierrez, C.
    Callol, L.
    LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 : S31 - S32
  • [29] Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath of COVID-19 Patients
    Oktavian, T.
    Chozin, I. N.
    Pratiwi, S. D.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [30] Breath Biopsy® to Identify Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Biomarkers for Liver Cirrhosis Detection
    Ferrandino, Giuseppe
    De Palo, Giovanna
    Murgia, Antonio
    Birch, Owen
    Tawfike, Ahmed
    Smith, Rob
    Debiram-Beecham, Irene
    Gandelman, Olga
    Kibble, Graham
    Lydon, Anne Marie
    Groves, Alice
    Smolinska, Agnieszka
    Allsworth, Max
    Boyle, Billy
    van der Schee, Marc P.
    Allison, Michael
    Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
    Hoare, Matthew
    Snowdon, Victoria K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 11 (03) : 638 - 648