Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study

被引:78
|
作者
Olsen, A. H. [1 ]
Bihrmann, K. [1 ]
Jensen, M-B [2 ]
Vejborg, I. [3 ]
Lynge, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Danish Breast Canc Cooperat Grp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Ctr Diagnost Imaging, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
malignant neoplasms; breast; mammography; screening; mortality; breast density; HORMONE-REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS; CANCER MORTALITY; PATTERNS; INTERVAL; DENMARK; RISK; COPENHAGEN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604989
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of breast density on breast cancer (BC) mortality in a mammography screening programme. The cohort included 48052 women participating in mammography screening in Copenhagen, Denmark, where biennial screening is offered to women aged 50-69 years. We collected information for the years 1991-2001 on screening outcome, incident BCs (screen-, interval-, and later detected), and BC deaths. Breast density was dichotomised into fatty (F) and mixed/dense (M/D) breasts. Screening sensitivity was measured as the odds ratio of interval versus screen- detected cancer for dense versus F breasts. Poisson regression was used to estimate the ratios for BC incidence, case fatality, and mortality between women with M/D and F breasts. For women with M/D breasts, the odds ratio of an interval cancer was 1.62 (95% confidence interval, Cl, 1.14-2.30), and the age-adjusted rate ratios were 2.45 (95% Cl 2.14-2.81) for BC incidence, 0.60 (95% Cl 0.43-0.84) for case fatality, and 1.78 (95% Cl 1.17-2.72) for BC mortality. The study shows that BC in women with M/D breasts is more frequent, but on average less severe, than in women with F breasts.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1208
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study
    Zahl, Per-Henrik
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Maehlen, Jan
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (12): : 1118 - 1124
  • [22] Impact of organised mammography screening on breast cancer mortality in a case–control and cohort study
    Sirpa Heinävaara
    Tytti Sarkeala
    Ahti Anttila
    British Journal of Cancer, 2016, 114 : 1038 - 1044
  • [23] Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark
    My von Euler-Chelpin
    Martin Lillholm
    Ilse Vejborg
    Mads Nielsen
    Elsebeth Lynge
    Breast Cancer Research, 21
  • [24] Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark
    von Euler-Chelpin, My
    Lillholm, Martin
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Nielsen, Mads
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [25] Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
    Stefanie Weigel
    W. Heindel
    J. Heidrich
    H.-W. Hense
    O. Heidinger
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 2744 - 2751
  • [26] Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, W.
    Heidrich, J.
    Hense, H. -W.
    Heidinger, O.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (07) : 2744 - 2751
  • [27] Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of “Informed”
    Karen E. Schifferdecker
    Anna N. A. Tosteson
    Celia Kaplan
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Diana S.M. Buist
    Louise M. Henderson
    Dianne Johnson
    Jill Jaworski
    Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti
    Kelly Ehrlich
    Mary W. Marsh
    Lisa Vu
    Tracy Onega
    Karen J. Wernli
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 1654 - 1660
  • [28] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Holland, Katharina
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [29] Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
    Johanna O. P. Wanders
    Katharina Holland
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    Ritse M. Mann
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Petra H. M. Peeters
    Carla H. van Gils
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 162 : 95 - 103
  • [30] Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of "Informed"
    Schifferdecker, Karen E.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Kaplan, Celia
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Johnson, Dianne
    Jaworski, Jill
    Jackson-Nefertiti, Gloria
    Ehrlich, Kelly
    Marsh, Mary W.
    Vu, Lisa
    Onega, Tracy
    Wernli, Karen J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1654 - 1660