Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study

被引:78
|
作者
Olsen, A. H. [1 ]
Bihrmann, K. [1 ]
Jensen, M-B [2 ]
Vejborg, I. [3 ]
Lynge, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Danish Breast Canc Cooperat Grp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Ctr Diagnost Imaging, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
malignant neoplasms; breast; mammography; screening; mortality; breast density; HORMONE-REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS; CANCER MORTALITY; PATTERNS; INTERVAL; DENMARK; RISK; COPENHAGEN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604989
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of breast density on breast cancer (BC) mortality in a mammography screening programme. The cohort included 48052 women participating in mammography screening in Copenhagen, Denmark, where biennial screening is offered to women aged 50-69 years. We collected information for the years 1991-2001 on screening outcome, incident BCs (screen-, interval-, and later detected), and BC deaths. Breast density was dichotomised into fatty (F) and mixed/dense (M/D) breasts. Screening sensitivity was measured as the odds ratio of interval versus screen- detected cancer for dense versus F breasts. Poisson regression was used to estimate the ratios for BC incidence, case fatality, and mortality between women with M/D and F breasts. For women with M/D breasts, the odds ratio of an interval cancer was 1.62 (95% confidence interval, Cl, 1.14-2.30), and the age-adjusted rate ratios were 2.45 (95% Cl 2.14-2.81) for BC incidence, 0.60 (95% Cl 0.43-0.84) for case fatality, and 1.78 (95% Cl 1.17-2.72) for BC mortality. The study shows that BC in women with M/D breasts is more frequent, but on average less severe, than in women with F breasts.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1208
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is mammography adequate for screening BRCA mutation carriers with low breast density?
    Bigenwald, R.
    Warner, E.
    Gunasekara, A.
    Hill, K.
    Causer, P.
    Messner, S.
    Eisen, A.
    Plewes, D.
    Narod, S.
    Yaffe, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 544S - 544S
  • [42] Breast density, hormones, and screening mammography: should women be less concerned?
    Sayegh, Raja A.
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2009, 16 (06): : 1085 - 1086
  • [43] Breast Density, Risk of Breast Cancer, and Screening Mammography in Women 75 Years and Older
    Tuite, Catherine M.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08)
  • [44] Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999–2011
    Stephen Morrell
    Richard Taylor
    David Roder
    Bridget Robson
    Marli Gregory
    Kirsty Craig
    British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 116 : 828 - 839
  • [45] Effect of organized mammography screening on breast cancer mortality: A population-based cohort study in Norway
    Moller, Mette H.
    Lousdal, Mette Lise
    Kristiansen, Ivar S.
    Stovring, Henrik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (04) : 697 - 706
  • [46] Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer survival in comparison to other detection methods: A retrospective cohort study
    Kawai, Masaaki
    Kuriyama, Shinichi
    Suzuki, Akihiko
    Nishino, Yoshikazu
    Ishida, Takanori
    Ohnuki, Koji
    Amari, Masakazu
    Tsuji, Ichiro
    Ohuchi, Noriaki
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2009, 100 (08) : 1479 - 1484
  • [47] Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium
    Emily F. Conant
    Elisabeth F. Beaber
    Brian L. Sprague
    Sally D. Herschorn
    Donald L. Weaver
    Tracy Onega
    Anna N. A. Tosteson
    Anne Marie McCarthy
    Steven P. Poplack
    Jennifer S. Haas
    Katrina Armstrong
    Mitchell D. Schnall
    William E. Barlow
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 156 : 109 - 116
  • [48] Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium
    Conant, Emily F.
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Onega, Tracy
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Barlow, William E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) : 109 - 116
  • [49] The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort
    Janet E Olson
    Thomas A Sellers
    Christopher G Scott
    Beth A Schueler
    Kathleen R Brandt
    Daniel J Serie
    Matthew R Jensen
    Fang-Fang Wu
    Marilyn J Morton
    John J Heine
    Fergus J Couch
    V Shane Pankratz
    Celine M Vachon
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [50] The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort
    Olson, Janet E.
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Schueler, Beth A.
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Serie, Daniel J.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Wu, Fang-Fang
    Morton, Marilyn J.
    Heine, John J.
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Vachon, Celine M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06):