Radiation Exposure of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography

被引:72
|
作者
Jeukens, Cecile R. L. P. N. [1 ]
Lalji, Ulrich C. [1 ]
Meijer, Eduard [1 ,2 ]
Bakija, Betina [1 ]
Theunissen, Robin [1 ]
Wildberger, Joachim E. [1 ,3 ]
Lobbes, Marc B. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Clin Phys, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[3] GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; CESM; CEDM; radiation dose; CANCER; UK;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000068
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) shows promising initial results but comes at the cost of increased dose as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). We aimed to quantitatively assess the dose increase of CESM in comparison with FFDM. Materials and Methods: Radiation exposure-related data (such as kilovoltage, compressed breast thickness, glandularity, entrance skin air kerma (ESAK), and average glandular dose (AGD) were retrieved for 47 CESM and 715 FFDM patients. All examinations were performed on 1 mammography unit. Radiation dose values reported by the unit were validated by phantom measurements. Descriptive statistics of the patient data were generated using a statistical software package. Results: Dose values reported by the mammography unit were in good qualitative agreement with those of phantom measurements. Mean ESAK was 10.5 mGy for a CESM exposure and 7.46 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Mean AGD for a CESM exposure was 2.80 mGy and 1.55 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Conclusions: Compared with our institutional FFDM, the AGD of a single CESM exposure is increased by 1.25 mGy (+81%), whereas ESAK is increased by 3.07 mGy (+41%). Dose values of both techniques meet the recommendations for maximum dose in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 665
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-detail evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system
    Darambara, DG
    Taibi, A
    Speller, RD
    Gambaccini, M
    1999 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 217 - 221
  • [32] Contrast-detail evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system
    Darambara, DG
    Taibi, A
    Speller, RD
    Gambaccini, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 47 (03) : 870 - 876
  • [33] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
    Fallenberg, Eva Maria
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Diekmann, Felix
    Renz, Diane M.
    Amer, Heba
    Ingold-Heppner, Barbara
    Neumann, Avidan U.
    Winzer, Klaus J.
    Bick, Ulrich
    Hamm, Bernd
    Engelken, Florian
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 146 (02) : 371 - 381
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
    Eva Maria Fallenberg
    Clarisse Dromain
    Felix Diekmann
    Diane M. Renz
    Heba Amer
    Barbara Ingold-Heppner
    Avidan U. Neumann
    Klaus J. Winzer
    Ulrich Bick
    Bernd Hamm
    Florian Engelken
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 146 : 371 - 381
  • [35] Comparison of Radiologist Performance with Photon-Counting Full-Field Digital Mammography to Conventional Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cole, Elodia B.
    Toledano, Alicia Y.
    Lundqvist, Mats
    Pisano, Etta D.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 916 - 922
  • [36] Clinical evaluation of CR mammography in comparison with full-field digital mammography
    Uchiyama, N
    Kobayashi, H
    Tanikoshi, M
    Machida, M
    Tajima, H
    Kumazaki, T
    Moriyama, N
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 494 - 496
  • [37] Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography
    Nykanen, KM
    Siltanen, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 120 - 121
  • [38] Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Byung Gil
    Song, ByungJoo
    Jung, Haijo
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2014, 27 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [39] Evaluation of the exposure dose reduction in full-field digital mammography system
    Tanigoshi, M
    Kobayashi, H
    Uchiyama, N
    Suzuki, T
    Kumazaki, T
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 149 - 151
  • [40] Current status of full-field digital mammography
    Pisano, ED
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) : 26 - 28