Radiation Exposure of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography

被引:72
|
作者
Jeukens, Cecile R. L. P. N. [1 ]
Lalji, Ulrich C. [1 ]
Meijer, Eduard [1 ,2 ]
Bakija, Betina [1 ]
Theunissen, Robin [1 ]
Wildberger, Joachim E. [1 ,3 ]
Lobbes, Marc B. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Clin Phys, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[3] GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; CESM; CEDM; radiation dose; CANCER; UK;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000068
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) shows promising initial results but comes at the cost of increased dose as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). We aimed to quantitatively assess the dose increase of CESM in comparison with FFDM. Materials and Methods: Radiation exposure-related data (such as kilovoltage, compressed breast thickness, glandularity, entrance skin air kerma (ESAK), and average glandular dose (AGD) were retrieved for 47 CESM and 715 FFDM patients. All examinations were performed on 1 mammography unit. Radiation dose values reported by the unit were validated by phantom measurements. Descriptive statistics of the patient data were generated using a statistical software package. Results: Dose values reported by the mammography unit were in good qualitative agreement with those of phantom measurements. Mean ESAK was 10.5 mGy for a CESM exposure and 7.46 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Mean AGD for a CESM exposure was 2.80 mGy and 1.55 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Conclusions: Compared with our institutional FFDM, the AGD of a single CESM exposure is increased by 1.25 mGy (+81%), whereas ESAK is increased by 3.07 mGy (+41%). Dose values of both techniques meet the recommendations for maximum dose in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 665
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF DOSE RECEIVED DURING BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS PERFORMED BY USING TWO DIFFERENT IMAGING MODALITIES: CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Kisielewicz, K.
    Rawojc, K.
    Tulik, M.
    Dziubinska, A.
    Mazur, L.
    Kieltyka, B.
    Lukaszewska, J.
    Najberg-Pierzchala, D.
    Gadek, M.
    Luczynska, E.
    Wos, Z.
    Miszczyk, J.
    Heinze, S.
    Dziecichowicz, A.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2020, 51 (01): : 339 - 344
  • [22] Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Phillips, Jordana
    Mihai, Georgeta
    Hassonjee, Sarah Esaa
    Raj, Sean D.
    Palmer, Matthew R.
    Brook, Alexander
    Zhang, Da
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [23] Systematic review comparing breast cancer detection of contrast enhanced spectral mammography with full field digital mammography
    Whitaker, Madeleine
    Nielsen-Moody, Anne
    Wolstenhulme, Stephen
    Sharma, Nisha
    Bull, Jane
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18
  • [24] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)
    James, J. J.
    Tennant, S. L.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (08) : 715 - 723
  • [25] Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector
    Gosch, D.
    Jendrass, S.
    Scholz, M.
    Kahn, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2006, 178 (07): : 693 - 697
  • [26] Advanced applications of digital mammography: Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Lewin, John M.
    Niklason, Loren
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 42 (04) : 243 - 252
  • [27] Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography
    Felix Diekmann
    Ulrich Bick
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 3086 - 3092
  • [28] Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography
    Diekmann, Felix
    Bick, Ulrich
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (12) : 3086 - 3092
  • [29] Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Diekmann, Felix
    Freyer, Martin
    Diekmann, Susanne
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    Fischer, Thomas
    Bick, Ulrich
    Poellinger, Alexander
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [30] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography and angiogenesis
    Rosado-Mendez, I.
    Palma, B. A.
    Villasenor, Y.
    Benitez-Bribiesca, L.
    Brandan, M. E.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 958 : 278 - +