Radiation Exposure of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography

被引:72
|
作者
Jeukens, Cecile R. L. P. N. [1 ]
Lalji, Ulrich C. [1 ]
Meijer, Eduard [1 ,2 ]
Bakija, Betina [1 ]
Theunissen, Robin [1 ]
Wildberger, Joachim E. [1 ,3 ]
Lobbes, Marc B. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Clin Phys, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[3] GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; CESM; CEDM; radiation dose; CANCER; UK;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000068
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) shows promising initial results but comes at the cost of increased dose as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). We aimed to quantitatively assess the dose increase of CESM in comparison with FFDM. Materials and Methods: Radiation exposure-related data (such as kilovoltage, compressed breast thickness, glandularity, entrance skin air kerma (ESAK), and average glandular dose (AGD) were retrieved for 47 CESM and 715 FFDM patients. All examinations were performed on 1 mammography unit. Radiation dose values reported by the unit were validated by phantom measurements. Descriptive statistics of the patient data were generated using a statistical software package. Results: Dose values reported by the mammography unit were in good qualitative agreement with those of phantom measurements. Mean ESAK was 10.5 mGy for a CESM exposure and 7.46 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Mean AGD for a CESM exposure was 2.80 mGy and 1.55 mGy for an FFDM exposure. Conclusions: Compared with our institutional FFDM, the AGD of a single CESM exposure is increased by 1.25 mGy (+81%), whereas ESAK is increased by 3.07 mGy (+41%). Dose values of both techniques meet the recommendations for maximum dose in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 665
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS WITH FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Avramova-Cholakova, Simona
    Kulama, Eugenia
    Daskalov, Sivo
    Loveland, John
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2021, 197 (3-4) : 212 - 229
  • [2] Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    Garza, Sandra Alheli
    Eversman, Sarah
    Lopez-Alvarez, Yania
    Kosiorek, Heidi
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 46 : 78 - 84
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts
    Miki Mori
    Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
    Satoko Suzuki
    Murasaki Ikeda Daniels
    Chie Watanabe
    Masanori Hirose
    Seigo Nakamura
    Breast Cancer, 2017, 24 : 104 - 110
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts
    Mori, Miki
    Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako
    Suzuki, Satoko
    Daniels, Murasaki Ikeda
    Watanabe, Chie
    Hirose, Masanori
    Nakamura, Seigo
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (01) : 104 - 110
  • [5] Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
    Francescone, Mark A.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Dershaw, D. David
    Sung, Janice S.
    Hughes, Mary C.
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (08) : 1350 - 1355
  • [6] Radiation Exposure of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Antiscatter Grid Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Paulis, Leonie E.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    Lalji, Ulrich C.
    Gelissen, Nicky
    Bouwman, Ramona W.
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    Jeukens, Cecile R. L. P. N.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (10) : 679 - 685
  • [7] Digital Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Hall, Ferris M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (01) : 240 - 240
  • [8] Full-field digital mammography
    Bick, U
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 957 - 964
  • [9] Full-field digital mammography
    U Bick
    Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy and Incremental Value of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared With Full Field Digital Mammography in a Tertiary Cancer Care Center
    Popat, Palak
    Nandi, Venugopal Prudveesh Kumar Reddy
    Katdare, Aparna
    Haria, Purvi
    Thakur, Meenakshi
    Kulkarni, Suyash
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)