Combining Evolutionary Algorithms and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Assessments

被引:64
|
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yunzhi [1 ]
Tsangaratos, Paraskevas [3 ]
Ilia, Ioanna [3 ]
Wang, Xiaojing [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geol & Environm, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Coal Resources Explorat & Comprehens Util, Xian 710021, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Min & Met Engn, Dept Geol Sci, Lab Engn Geol & Hydrogeol, Zografos 15780, Greece
关键词
landslide susceptibility; feature selection; optimizing structural parameters; evolutionary algorithms; genetic algorithms; particle swarm optimization; support vector machines; artificial neural network; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; CONDITIONING FACTORS; SPATIAL PREDICTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GIS;
D O I
10.3390/rs12233854
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of the present study is to introduce a novel predictive model that combines evolutionary algorithms and machine learning (ML) models, so as to construct a landslide susceptibility map. Genetic algorithms (GA) are used as a feature selection method, whereas the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is used to optimize the structural parameters of two ML models, support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN). A well-defined spatial database, which included 335 landslides and twelve landslide-related variables (elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, curvature, plan curvature, profile curvature, topographic wetness index, stream power index, distance to faults, distance to river, lithology, and hydrological cover) are considered for the analysis, in the Achaia Regional Unit located in Northern Peloponnese, Greece. The outcome of the study illustrates that both ML models have an excellent performance, with the SVM model achieving the highest learning accuracy (0.977 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (AUC)), followed by the ANN model (0.969). However, the ANN model shows the highest prediction accuracy (0.800 AUC), followed by the SVM (0.750 AUC) model. Overall, the proposed ML models highlights the necessity of feature selection and tuning procedures via evolutionary optimization algorithms and that such approaches could be successfully used for landslide susceptibility mapping as an alternative investigation tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A novel evolutionary combination of artificial intelligence algorithm and machine learning for landslide susceptibility mapping in the west of Iran
    Shen, Yue
    Dehrashid, Atefeh Ahmadi
    Bahar, Ramin Atash
    Moayedi, Hossein
    Nasrollahizadeh, Bahram
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (59) : 123480 - 123496
  • [42] Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling
    Vu Viet Nguyen
    Binh Thai Pham
    Ba Thao Vu
    Prakash, Indra
    Jha, Sudan
    Shahabi, Himan
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Dong Nguyen Ba
    Kumar, Raghvendra
    Chatterjee, Jyotir Moy
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. FORESTS, 2019, 10 (02):
  • [43] Improving GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessments with Multi-temporal Remote Sensing and Machine Learning
    Lai, Jhe-Syuan
    Tsai, Fuan
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (17)
  • [44] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Machine Learning Algorithm
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Wang, Run
    Shah, Safeer Ullah
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Ali, Nafees
    Xu, Daozhu
    Ma, Chao
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2022, 8 (02): : 209 - 224
  • [45] Determination of GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility and Ground Dynamics with Geophysical Measurements and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Hilmi Dindar
    Çağan Alevkayalı
    [J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2023, 9
  • [46] Determination of GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility and Ground Dynamics with Geophysical Measurements and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Dindar, Hilmi
    Alevkayali, Cagan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOSYNTHETICS AND GROUND ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [47] Effect of spatial resolution and data splitting on landslide susceptibility mapping using different machine learning algorithms
    Abraham, Minu Treesa
    Satyam, Neelima
    Jain, Prashita
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Alamri, Abdullah
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 3381 - 3408
  • [48] Essential insights into decision mechanism of landslide susceptibility mapping based on different machine learning models
    Sun, Deliang
    Ding, Yuekai
    Zhang, Jialan
    Wen, Haijia
    Wang, Yue
    Xu, Jiahui
    Zhou, Xinzhi
    Liu, Rui
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022,
  • [49] Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey
    Akinci, Halil
    Zeybek, Mustafa
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (02) : 1515 - 1543
  • [50] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Driving Mechanisms in a Vulnerable Region Based on Multiple Machine Learning Models
    Yu, Haiwei
    Pei, Wenjie
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Chen, Guangsheng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (07)