Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey

被引:53
|
作者
Akinci, Halil [1 ]
Zeybek, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Artvin Coruh Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-08100 Artvin, Turkey
[2] Selcuk Univ, Guneysinir Vocat Sch, Guneysinir, Konya, Turkey
关键词
GIS; Landslide susceptibility assessment; Logistic regression; Support vector machine; Random forest; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SPATIAL PREDICTION MODELS; REGRESSION TREE MODELS; 3 GORGES RESERVOIR; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; RANDOM FOREST; INFORMATION VALUE; DECISION TREE; NEURAL-NETWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-021-04743-4
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility maps provide crucial information that helps local authorities, public institutions, and land-use planners make the correct decisions when they are managing landslide-prone areas. In recent years, machine-learning techniques have become very popular for producing landslide susceptibility maps. This study aims to compare the performance of these machine learning models with the traditional statistical methods used to produce landslide susceptibility maps. The landslide susceptibility for Ardanuc, Turkey was evaluated using three models: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). Ten parameters that are effective in landslide occurrence are used in this study. The accuracy and prediction capabilities of the models were assessed using both the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) methods. According to the AUC method, the success rate of the LR, SVM, and RF models was 83.1%, 93.2%, and 98.3%, respectively. Further, the prediction rates were calculated as 82.9% (LR), 92.8% (SVM), and 97.7% (RF). According to the verification results, RF and SVM models outperformed the traditional LR model in terms of success and prediction rate. The RF model, however, performed better than the SVM model in terms of success and prediction rates. The landslide susceptibility maps produced as a result of this study can guide city planners, local administrators, and public institutions related to disaster management to prevent and reduce landslide hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1543
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey
    Halil Akinci
    Mustafa Zeybek
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2021, 108 : 1515 - 1543
  • [2] Assessment of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Artvin, Turkey using machine learning techniques
    Akinci, Halil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 191
  • [3] Comparison of tree-based ensemble learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Murgul (Artvin), Turkey
    Usta, Ziya
    Akinci, Halil
    Akin, Alper Tunga
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2024, 17 (02) : 1459 - 1481
  • [4] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING
    Yi, Yaning
    Zhang, Zhijie
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Xu, Chi
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 9318 - 9321
  • [5] Random Forest-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Coastal Regions of Artvin, Turkey
    Akinci, Halil
    Kilicoglu, Cem
    Dogan, Sedat
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (09)
  • [6] Comparing Convolutional Neural Network and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Wenchuan County
    Zhang, Sikui
    Bai, Lin
    Li, Yuanwei
    Li, Weile
    Xie, Mingli
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [7] Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhou, Yulong
    Daud, Hamza
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [8] Effects of non-landslide sampling strategies on machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Gu, Tengfei
    Duan, Ping
    Wang, Mingguo
    Li, Jia
    Zhang, Yanke
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [9] Application of Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Kadavi, Prima Riza
    Lee, Chang-Wook
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [10] Exploring Complementary Models Consisting of Machine Learning Algorithms for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Hu, Han
    Wang, Changming
    Liang, Zhu
    Gao, Ruiyuan
    Li, Bailong
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (10)