Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Machine Learning Algorithm

被引:16
|
作者
Hussain, Muhammad Afaq [1 ]
Chen, Zhanlong [1 ]
Wang, Run [1 ]
Shah, Safeer Ullah [2 ]
Shoaib, Muhammad [3 ]
Ali, Nafees [4 ]
Xu, Daozhu [5 ]
Ma, Chao [5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geog Informat Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Climate Change, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] State Key Lab Geoinformat Engn, Xian Stn Surveying & Mapping, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
来源
CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN | 2022年 / 8卷 / 02期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide Susceptibility Modelling; Proportion; Efficient; Random Forest; BALA ROCK AVALANCHE; KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE; SPATIAL PREDICTION; ENTROPY MODELS; DECISION TREE; RANDOM FOREST; MULTIVARIATE; SIMULATION; ENSEMBLES; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-02-02
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Landslides are natural disasters that have resulted in the loss of economies and lives over the years. The landslides caused by the 2005 Muzaffarabad earthquake heavily impacted the area, and slopes in the region have become unstable. This research was carried out to find out which areas, as in Muzaffarabad district, are sensitive to landslides and to define the relationship between landslides and geo-environmental factors using three tree-based classifiers, namely, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). These machine learning models are innovative and can assess environmental problems and hazards for any given area on a regional scale. The research consists of three steps: Firstly, for training and validation, 94 historical landslides were randomly split into a proportion of 7/3. Secondly, topographical and geological data as well as satellite imagery were gathered, analyzed, and built into a spatial database using GIS Environment. Nine layers of landslide-conditioning factors were developed, including Aspect, Elevation, Slope, NDVI, Curvature, SPI, TWI, Lithology, and Landcover. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) value were used to estimate the model's efficiency. The area under the curve values for the RF, XGBoost, and KNN models are 0.895 (89.5%), 0.893 (89.3%), and 0.790 (79.0%), respectively. Based on the three machine learning techniques, the innovative outputs show that the performance of the Random Forest model has a maximum AUC value of 0.895, and it is more efficient than the other tree-based classifiers. Elevation and Slope were determined as the most important factors affecting landslides in this research area. The landslide susceptibility maps were classified into four classes: low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility. The result maps are useful for future generalized construction operations, such as selecting and conserving new urban and infrastructural areas.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 224
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Landslide susceptibility mapping using XGBoost machine learning method
    Badola, Shubham
    Mishra, Varun Narayan
    Parkash, Surya
    [J]. 2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE INTELLIGENCE FOR GEOANALYTICS AND REMOTE SENSING, MIGARS, 2023, : 148 - 151
  • [2] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey
    Ado, Moziihrii
    Amitab, Khwairakpam
    Maji, Arnab Kumar
    Jasinska, Elzbieta
    Gono, Radomir
    Leonowicz, Zbigniew
    Jasinski, Michal
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [3] Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Kovacevic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Vozenilek, Vit
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2011, 123 (03) : 225 - 234
  • [4] Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques
    Agboola, Gazali
    Beni, Leila Hashemi
    Elbayoumi, Tamer
    Thompson, Gary
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 81
  • [5] Assessing and mapping landslide susceptibility using different machine learning methods
    Orhan, Osman
    Bilgilioglu, Suleyman Sefa
    Kaya, Zehra
    Ozcan, Adem Kursat
    Bilgilioglu, Hacer
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (10) : 2795 - 2820
  • [6] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Danish Case Study
    Ageenko, Angelina
    Hansen, Laerke Christina
    Lyng, Kevin Lundholm
    Bodum, Lars
    Arsanjani, Jamal Jokar
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [7] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Shahabi, Himan
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Wolf, Isabelle D.
    Ariffin, Effi Helmy
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [8] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of Oregon
    Wu, Bin
    Shi, Zhenming
    Peng, Ming
    [J]. GEOSHANGHAI 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, VOL 5, 2024, 1334
  • [9] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithm Validated by Persistent Scatterer In-SAR Technique
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Zheng, Ying
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Shah, Safeer Ullah
    Ali, Nafees
    Afzal, Zeeshan
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (09)
  • [10] Landslide susceptibility mapping using Forest by Penalizing Attributes (FPA) algorithm based machine learning approach
    Tran Van Phong
    Hai-Bang Ly
    Phan Trong Trinh
    Prakash, Indra
    Dao Trung Hoan
    [J]. VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 42 (03): : 237 - 246