The Utility of Multistate Models: A Flexible Framework for Time-to-Event Data

被引:19
|
作者
Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G. [1 ]
Therneau, Terry M. [1 ]
Ou, Fang-Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Trials & Biostat, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Multistate models; Survival analysis; Time-to-event data; Competing risks; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1007/s40471-022-00291-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review Survival analyses are common and essential in medical research. Most readers are familiar with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models; however, very few are familiar with multistate models. Although multistate models were introduced in 1965, they only recently receive more attention in the medical research community. The current review introduces common terminologies and quantities that can be estimated from multistate models. Examples from published literature are used to illustrate the utility of multistate models. Recent Findings A figure of states and transitions is a useful depiction of a multistate model. Clinically meaningful quantities that can be estimated from a multistate model include the probability in a state at a given time, the average time in a state, and the expected number of visits to a state; all of which describe the absolute risks of an event. Relative risk can also be estimated using multistate hazard models. Summary Multistate models provide a more general and flexible framework that extends beyond the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox models. Multistate models allow simultaneous analyses of multiple disease pathways to provide insights into the natural history of complex diseases. We strongly encourage the use of multistate models when analyzing time-to-event data.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Utility of Multistate Models: A Flexible Framework for Time-to-Event Data
    Jennifer G. Le-Rademacher
    Terry M. Therneau
    Fang-Shu Ou
    [J]. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2022, 9 : 183 - 189
  • [2] Flowgraph models for multistate time-to-event data.
    Andersen, Per Krach
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) : 941 - 942
  • [3] A flexible joint modeling framework for longitudinal and time-to-event data with overdispersion
    Njagi, Edmund N.
    Molenberghs, Geert
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Verbeke, Geert
    Kenward, Michael G.
    Dendale, Paul
    Willekens, Koen
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 1661 - 1676
  • [4] Dynamic predictions using flexible joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Barrett, Jessica
    Su, Li
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (09) : 1447 - 1460
  • [5] Approximation of Bayesian models for time-to-event data
    Catalano, Marta
    Lijoi, Antonio
    Prunster, Igor
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 14 (02): : 3366 - 3395
  • [6] Flexible semiparametric mode regression for time-to-event data
    Seipp, Alexander
    Uslar, Verena
    Weyhe, Dirk
    Timmer, Antje
    Otto-Sobotka, Fabian
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (12) : 2352 - 2367
  • [7] Simulating time-to-event data from parametric distributions, custom distributions, competing-risks models, and general multistate models
    Crowther, Michael J.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (01): : 3 - 24
  • [8] Joint Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data and Time-to-Event Data
    Takeda, Yuriko
    Misumi, Toshihiro
    Yamamoto, Kouji
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (19)
  • [9] Boosting joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Klein, Nadja
    Kneib, Thomas
    Pressler, Tania
    Schmid, Matthias
    Mayr, Andreas
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (06) : 1104 - 1121
  • [10] Generalized survival models for correlated time-to-event data
    Liu, Xing-Rong
    Pawitan, Yudi
    Clements, Mark S.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (29) : 4743 - 4762