Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections

被引:7
|
作者
Runyan, Hugh [1 ]
Petrovic, Vid [2 ]
Edwards, Clinton B. [1 ]
Pedersen, Nicole [1 ]
Alcantar, Esmeralda [1 ]
Kuester, Falko [2 ]
Sandin, Stuart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Sandin Lab, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Qualcomm Inst, Cultural Heritage Engn Initiat, San Diego, CA USA
来源
关键词
coral; segmentation; automated; pointcloud; orthoprojection; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2022.884317
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, similar to 80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AUTOMATED 2D/3D REGISTRATION FOR LUNG BRACHYTHERAPY
    Zvonarev, P.
    Farrell, T.
    Hunter, R.
    Hayward, J.
    Wierzbicki, M.
    Sur, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S479 - S479
  • [42] Fabrication and characterization of 2.5D and 3D SiCf/SiC composites
    Zhao, Shuang
    Zhou, Xingui
    Yu, Jinshan
    Mummery, Paul
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 88 (9-10) : 2453 - 2456
  • [43] Foundry TSV Enablement For 2.5D/3D Chip Stacking
    Yu, Remi
    2012 IEEE HOT CHIPS 24 SYMPOSIUM (HCS), 2012,
  • [44] MarrNet: 3D Shape Reconstruction via 2.5D Sketches
    Wu, Jiajun
    Wang, Yifan
    Xue, Tianfan
    Sun, Xingyuan
    Freeman, William T.
    Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30
  • [45] Compact Models and Model Standard for 2.5D and 3D Integration
    Zou, Qiaosha
    Xie, Yuan
    2014 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SYSTEM LEVEL INTERCONNECT PREDICTION (SLIP), 2014,
  • [46] ESD process assessment of 2.5D and 3D bonding technologies
    Simicic, Marko
    Gijbels, Frank
    Iacovo, Serena
    Chen, Shih-Hung
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Beyne, Eric
    2023 45TH ANNUAL EOS/ESD SYMPOSIUM, EOS/ESD, 2023,
  • [47] Technology Trends in 2.5D/3D Packaging and Heterogeneous Integration
    Kawano, Masaya
    2021 5TH IEEE ELECTRON DEVICES TECHNOLOGY & MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE (EDTM), 2021,
  • [48] 2.5D and 3D Technology Challenges and Test Vehicle Demonstrations
    Knickerbocker, J. U.
    Andry, P. S.
    Colgan, E.
    Dang, B.
    Dickson, T.
    Gu, X.
    Haymes, C.
    Jahnes, C.
    Liu, Y.
    Maria, J.
    Polastre, R. J.
    Tsang, C. K.
    Turlapati, L.
    Webb, B. C.
    Wiggins, L.
    Wright, S. L.
    2012 IEEE 62ND ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2012, : 1068 - 1076
  • [49] Novel TSV Process Technologies for 2.5D/3D Packaging
    Morikawa, Y.
    Murayama, T.
    Sakuishi, T.
    Suzuki, A.
    Nakamuta, Y.
    Suu, K.
    2014 IEEE 64TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2014, : 1697 - 1699