Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections

被引:7
|
作者
Runyan, Hugh [1 ]
Petrovic, Vid [2 ]
Edwards, Clinton B. [1 ]
Pedersen, Nicole [1 ]
Alcantar, Esmeralda [1 ]
Kuester, Falko [2 ]
Sandin, Stuart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Sandin Lab, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Qualcomm Inst, Cultural Heritage Engn Initiat, San Diego, CA USA
来源
关键词
coral; segmentation; automated; pointcloud; orthoprojection; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2022.884317
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, similar to 80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D harnessing of light with 2.5D photonic crystals
    Viktorovitch, Pierre
    Ben Bakir, Badhise
    Boutami, Salim
    Leclercq, Jean-Louis
    Letartre, Xavier
    Rojo-Romeo, Pedro
    Seassal, Christian
    Zussy, Marc
    Di Cioccio, Lea
    Fedeli, Jean-Marc
    LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS, 2010, 4 (03) : 401 - 413
  • [22] Cost Comparison between 3D and 2.5D Integration
    Velenis, Dimitrios
    Detalle, Mikael
    Civale, Yann
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Beyer, Gerald
    Beyne, Eric
    2012 4TH ELECTRONIC SYSTEM-INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ESTC), 2012,
  • [23] 2.5D and 3D Heterogeneous Integration: Emerging applications
    Sheikh F.
    Nagisetty R.
    Karnik T.
    Kehlet D.
    IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2021, 13 (04): : 77 - 87
  • [24] 3D SoC integration, beyond 2.5D chiplets
    Beyne, Eric
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Beyer, Gerald
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING (IEDM), 2021,
  • [25] 网游的2.5D与3D之争
    房燕良
    程序员, 2010, (08) : 23 - 23
  • [26] 2.5D/3D Integration Technologies for Circuit Obfuscation
    Xie, Yang
    Bao, Chongxi
    Liu, Yuntao
    Srivastava, Ankur
    2016 17TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MICROPROCESSOR AND SOC TEST AND VERIFICATION (MTV), 2016, : 39 - 44
  • [27] Matching 2.5D face scans to 3D models
    Lu, XG
    Jain, AK
    Colbry, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2006, 28 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [28] Reliability Challenges in 2.5D and 3D IC Integration
    Li, Li
    Ton, Paul
    Nagar, Mohan
    Chia, Pierre
    2017 IEEE 67TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC 2017), 2017, : 1504 - 1509
  • [29] Reliability Challenges for 2.5D/3D Integration: an Overview
    Premachandran, C. S.
    Choi, Seungman
    Cimino, Salvatore
    Thuy Tran-Quinn
    Burrell, Lloyd
    Justison, Patrick
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM (IRPS), 2018,
  • [30] Design Issues in Heterogeneous 3D/2.5D Integration
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Marchal, Pol
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Verkest, Diederik
    Beyne, Eric
    2013 18TH ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (ASP-DAC), 2013, : 403 - 410