Automated 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Segmentation of Coral Reef Pointclouds and Orthoprojections

被引:7
|
作者
Runyan, Hugh [1 ]
Petrovic, Vid [2 ]
Edwards, Clinton B. [1 ]
Pedersen, Nicole [1 ]
Alcantar, Esmeralda [1 ]
Kuester, Falko [2 ]
Sandin, Stuart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Sandin Lab, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Qualcomm Inst, Cultural Heritage Engn Initiat, San Diego, CA USA
来源
关键词
coral; segmentation; automated; pointcloud; orthoprojection; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2022.884317
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Enabled by advancing technology, coral reef researchers increasingly prefer use of image-based surveys over approaches depending solely upon in situ observations, interpretations, and recordings of divers. The images collected, and derivative products such as orthographic projections and 3D models, allow researchers to study a comprehensive digital twin of their field sites. Spatio-temporally located twins can be compared and annotated, enabling researchers to virtually return to sites long after they have left them. While these new data expand the variety and specificity of biological investigation that can be pursued, they have introduced the much-discussed Big Data Problem: research labs lack the human and computational resources required to process and analyze imagery at the rate it can be collected. The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles suggests researchers will soon have access to an even greater volume of imagery and other sensor measurements than can be collected by diver-piloted platforms, further exacerbating data handling limitations. Thoroughly segmenting (tracing the extent of and taxonomically identifying) organisms enables researchers to extract the information image products contain, but is very time-consuming. Analytic techniques driven by neural networks offer the possibility that the segmentation process can be greatly accelerated through automation. In this study, we examine the efficacy of automated segmentation on three different image-derived data products: 3D models, and 2D and 2.5D orthographic projections thereof; we also contrast their relative accessibility and utility to different avenues of biological inquiry. The variety of network architectures and parameters tested performed similarly, similar to 80% IoU for the genus Porites, suggesting that the primary limitations to an automated workflow are 1) the current capabilities of neural network technology, and 2) consistency and quality control in image product collection and human training/testing dataset generation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multimodal 2D, 2.5D & 3D face verification
    Conde, Cristina
    Serrano, Angel
    Cabello, Enrique
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 2061 - +
  • [2] Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation
    Avesta, Arman
    Hossain, Sajid
    Lin, MingDe
    Aboian, Mariam
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [3] Comparison of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D segmentation networks for maxillary sinuses and lesions in CBCT images
    Yeon-Sun Yoo
    DaEl Kim
    Su Yang
    Se-Ryong Kang
    Jo-Eun Kim
    Kyung-Hoe Huh
    Sam-Sun Lee
    Min-Suk Heo
    Won-Jin Yi
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [4] Comparison of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D segmentation networks for maxillary sinuses and lesions in CBCT images
    Yoo, Yeon-Sun
    Kim, Dael
    Yang, Su
    Kang, Se-Ryong
    Kim, Jo-Eun
    Huh, Kyung-Hoe
    Lee, Sam-Sun
    Heo, Min-Suk
    Yi, Won-Jin
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] 2D 2.5D 3D以及4D之间的差异
    A.KeithTurner
    郭秋英
    测绘通报, 1998, (02) : 43 - 44
  • [6] Bridging 2D and 3D segmentation networks for computation-efficient volumetric medical image segmentation: An empirical study of 2.5D solutions
    Zhang, Yichi
    Liao, Qingcheng
    Ding, Le
    Zhang, Jicong
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2022, 99
  • [7] From 2D images to 2.5D sprites: A layered approach to modeling 3D scenes
    Szeliski, R
    Anandan, P
    Baker, S
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING AND SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS VOL 1, 1999, : 44 - 50
  • [8] 2D, 2.5D, or 3D? An Exploratory Study on Multilayer Network Visualisations in Virtual Reality
    Feyer, Stefan P.
    Pinaud, Bruno
    Kobourov, Stephen
    Brich, Nicolas
    Krone, Michael
    Kerren, Andreas
    Behrisch, Michael
    Schreiber, Falk
    Klein, Karsten
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2024, 30 (01) : 469 - 479
  • [9] Contribution to IPW2 by Studying Single and Multilayer Icing in 2D, 2.5D and 3D
    Blanchet, Maxime
    Zayni, Mohamad Karim
    Laurendeau, Eric
    AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024,
  • [10] Automated Inspection and Metrology for 2.5D and 3D/TSV Process Assurance
    Wood, James
    Soler, Vilmarie
    Perfecto, Eric
    Luckenbach, Thomas
    Shoukrun, Aki
    2014 IEEE 64TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2014, : 1606 - 1609