Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening

被引:6
|
作者
Meethal, Najiya Sundus Kadavath [1 ,2 ]
Pel, Johan J. M. [1 ]
Mazumdar, Deepmala [1 ,2 ]
Asokan, Rashima [2 ]
Panday, Manish [2 ]
van der Steen, Johannes [1 ,3 ]
George, Ronnie [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosci, Vestibular & Ocular Motor Res Grp, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med & Vis Res Fdn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Royal Dutch Visio, Huizen, Netherlands
关键词
Glaucoma screening; Visual field defects; Perimetry; Eye movement perimetry; Saccadic reaction time; Frequency doubling perimetry; Robin's score; Patient preference; VISUAL-FIELD; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-019-04311-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the screening accuracy of an Eye Movement Perimetry (EMP) in comparison with Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) and to investigate the patient preference and perception towards these visual field screening methods.MethodsA total of 104 healthy subjects (mean age (SD) of 48 (14) years) and 73 glaucoma patients (mean age (SD) of 52 (13) years) were recruited. All the participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including the 24-2 SITA standard protocol on the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). This was followed by the 26-point protocol in EMP and the C-20-1 protocol in FDP. During EMP, all subjects were instructed to fixate a central target and to look at the detected peripheral target, followed by refixation of the central target and Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT) towards each of the seen stimuli was calculated. Next, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate the patient preference and perception towards the perimetry techniques. Mean SRTs and Robin scores were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves to determine the screening accuracies. From the questionnaire survey, the frequency distributions of the responses were calculated.ResultsRobin score and SRT were significantly increased in glaucoma patients in comparison with the age-matched healthy subjects (p<0.001). The ROC analysis revealed comparable Area Under the Curve (AUC) values (0.95, p=0.81) with a specificity of 95.2% for FDP and 96.2% for EMP with a sensitivity of 87.7%. Thirty-seven percent of the older age group (40years) and 65% of severe glaucoma patients showed preference for EMP over FDP.ConclusionsThis study results indicate that the customized protocol in EMP provides efficient and rapid means of screening visual field defects in glaucoma, which compared well with FDP. Elderly healthy participants and patients with moderate and severe glaucomatous defectspreferred EMP as it permitted natural reflexive eye movements thereby resembling a real-life test setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1287
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma
    Leeprechanon, Narakorn
    Giaconi, Joann A.
    Manassakorn, Anita
    Hoffman, Douglas
    Caprioli, Joseph
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (05) : 931 - 937
  • [22] Short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma
    Fogagnolo, Paolo
    Rossetti, Luca
    Ranno, Stefano
    Ferreras, Antonio
    Orzalesi, Nicola
    GLAUCOMA: AN OPEN WINDOW TO NEURODEGENERATION AND NEUROPROTECTION, 2008, 173 : 101 - 124
  • [23] Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry
    Trible, JR
    Schultz, RO
    Robinson, JC
    Rothe, TL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (06) : 740 - 745
  • [24] Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma
    Fujimoto, N
    Minowa, K
    Miyauchi, O
    Hanawa, T
    Adachi-Usami, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 133 (02) : 269 - 270
  • [25] The ability of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma
    Zhao, X
    Xu, L
    Zhang, R
    Ma, Y
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U491 - U491
  • [26] Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry
    Heeg, GP
    Jansonius, NM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (03) : 585 - 587
  • [27] Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma
    Kogure, S
    Toda, Y
    Crabb, D
    Kashiwagi, K
    Fitzke, FW
    Tsukahara, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (05) : 604 - 608
  • [28] Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma
    Seong Ah Kim
    Chan Kee Park
    Hae-Young Lopilly Park
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [29] Prospective and randomized comparison of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma
    Kampmeier, J
    Eisert, B
    Buchwald, HJ
    Lang, GK
    Lang, GE
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2001, 218 (03) : 157 - 167
  • [30] Glaucoma Monitoring with Frequency Doubling Perimetry in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study
    Wesselink, Christiaan
    Jansonius, Nomdo
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)