Electrical Interaction between Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device and Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Device

被引:0
|
作者
Libbus, Imad [1 ]
Mazar, Scott T. [1 ]
Stubbs, Scott R. [1 ]
KenKnight, Bruce H. [1 ]
机构
[1] LivaNova, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
关键词
CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; HEART-FAILURE; PATIENT; PACEMAKER; UNIT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Autonomic regulation therapy via vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was recently approved as a therapy for chronic heart failure, and will likely be utilized in patients who are also indicated for cardiac rhythm management device implantation. This study is designed to assess the degree to which VNS is likely to cause interference in the cardiac sensing of an implantable cardiac rhythm management device. Methods: A VNS stimulation lead and a cardiac sensing lead were placed in a simulated biological medium. A nonconductive carrier frame was used to position the leads at a precise electrode spacing. Stimulation was delivered through the VNS Therapy lead at a maximum output current and a variety of combinations of stimulation frequencies from 5-30 Hz and stimulation pulse widths from 130-1000 mu s. The electrode spacing began at 0 cm and was increased in 1 cm increments until the measured signal dropped below the cardiac rhythm management device noise floor for sensing. The test was conducted with both bipolar and unipolar sensing. Results: In the bipolar sensing configuration, the maximum sensed signal amplitude was 687 mu V at an electrode separation of 0 cm, signal frequency of 30 Hz, pulse width of 1000 mu s, and output current of 3.5 mA. In the unipolar sensing configuration, the maximum amplitude was 406 mu V. In both configurations, the measured signal with maximum stimulation intensity decreased significantly with electrode separation, and dropped below the noise floor at an electrode spacing of 3.0 cm. The sensed signal amplitude was further attenuated at lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths. Conclusion: Even at maximum neural stimulation intensity of 3.5 mA, at an electrode separation of at least 3.0 cm, neural stimulation did not result in a detectable level of interference with either bipolar or unipolar sensing. Because this separation is significantly smaller than the minimum electrode separation of 15 cm in clinical practice, VNS Therapy is not expected to interfere with the function of implantable cardiac devices.
引用
收藏
页码:3681 / 3684
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Future of Implantable Devices for Cardiac Rhythm Management
    Lau, Chu-Pak
    Siu, Chung-Wah
    Tse, Hung-Fat
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 129 (07) : 811 - 822
  • [42] Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation would be an alternative to implantable cervical vagus nerve stimulation in some situation
    He, Jiakai
    Zhang, Jinling
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Shaoyuan
    Fang, Jiliang
    Zhang, Shuai
    Zhao, Yanan
    Zhai, Weihang
    Gao, Deqiang
    Li, Ran
    Jiang, Yuhang
    Chen, Zehao
    Jia, Baohui
    Rong, Peijing
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2023, 43 (03) : 627 - 630
  • [43] Implantable device for long-term electrical stimulation of denervated muscles in rabbits
    H. Lanmüller
    Z. Ashley
    E. Unger
    H. Sutherland
    M. Reichel
    M. Russold
    J. Jarvis
    W. Mayr
    S. Salmons
    Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2005, 43 : 535 - 540
  • [44] Long-Term Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Device Use in Heart Transplant Patients
    Waring, Ashley
    Mawardi, George
    Northup, Amanda
    Ramu, Bhavadharini
    VanBakel, Adrian B.
    Ramakrishnan, Viswanathan
    Gold, Michael R.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [45] Microbiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Tascini, Carlo
    Tagliaferri, Enrico
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Soldati, Ezio
    Leonildi, Alessandro
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Ciullo, Ilaria
    Menichetti, Francesco
    EUROPACE, 2012, 14 (09): : 1334 - 1339
  • [46] Radiotherapy in Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
    Sharifzadehgan, Ardalan
    Laurans, Marc
    Thuillot, Marine
    Huertas, Andres
    Baudinaud, Pierre
    Narayanan, Kumar
    Mirabel, Mariana
    Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
    Frey, Pierre
    Waldmann, Victor
    Varlet, Emilie
    Amet, Denis
    Juin, Christophe
    Lavergne, Thomas
    Jouven, Xavier
    Giraud, Philippe
    Durdux, Catherine
    Marijon, Eloi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 128 : 196 - 201
  • [47] Management and safety report for patients with cardiac implantable electronic device in radiotherapy
    Di Biase, S.
    Fenu, F.
    Di Carlo, C.
    Costantini, S.
    Cucciarelli, F.
    Montisci, M.
    Madia, M.
    Vicenzi, L.
    Giacometti, M.
    Valenti, M.
    Parisotto, M.
    Maggi, S.
    Mantello, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S687 - S687
  • [48] Use of an Electronic Health Record to Identify Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Device Lead Failure
    Brock, Jonathan
    Bundy, Richa
    Rosenthal, Gary
    Rodgers, Larisa
    Bhave, Prashant
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [49] The Evolution of the Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Connector
    Mond, Harry G.
    Helland, John R.
    Fischer, Avi
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (11): : 1434 - 1446
  • [50] The Luck of Having a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
    Costanzo, Maria Rosa
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 11 (07)