Electrical Interaction between Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device and Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Device

被引:0
|
作者
Libbus, Imad [1 ]
Mazar, Scott T. [1 ]
Stubbs, Scott R. [1 ]
KenKnight, Bruce H. [1 ]
机构
[1] LivaNova, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
关键词
CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; HEART-FAILURE; PATIENT; PACEMAKER; UNIT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Autonomic regulation therapy via vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was recently approved as a therapy for chronic heart failure, and will likely be utilized in patients who are also indicated for cardiac rhythm management device implantation. This study is designed to assess the degree to which VNS is likely to cause interference in the cardiac sensing of an implantable cardiac rhythm management device. Methods: A VNS stimulation lead and a cardiac sensing lead were placed in a simulated biological medium. A nonconductive carrier frame was used to position the leads at a precise electrode spacing. Stimulation was delivered through the VNS Therapy lead at a maximum output current and a variety of combinations of stimulation frequencies from 5-30 Hz and stimulation pulse widths from 130-1000 mu s. The electrode spacing began at 0 cm and was increased in 1 cm increments until the measured signal dropped below the cardiac rhythm management device noise floor for sensing. The test was conducted with both bipolar and unipolar sensing. Results: In the bipolar sensing configuration, the maximum sensed signal amplitude was 687 mu V at an electrode separation of 0 cm, signal frequency of 30 Hz, pulse width of 1000 mu s, and output current of 3.5 mA. In the unipolar sensing configuration, the maximum amplitude was 406 mu V. In both configurations, the measured signal with maximum stimulation intensity decreased significantly with electrode separation, and dropped below the noise floor at an electrode spacing of 3.0 cm. The sensed signal amplitude was further attenuated at lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths. Conclusion: Even at maximum neural stimulation intensity of 3.5 mA, at an electrode separation of at least 3.0 cm, neural stimulation did not result in a detectable level of interference with either bipolar or unipolar sensing. Because this separation is significantly smaller than the minimum electrode separation of 15 cm in clinical practice, VNS Therapy is not expected to interfere with the function of implantable cardiac devices.
引用
收藏
页码:3681 / 3684
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Problems with implantable cardiac device therapy
    Kowalski, Marcin
    Huizar, Jose F.
    Kaszala, Karoly
    Wood, Mark A.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2008, 26 (03) : 441 - +
  • [22] Cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Lambert, Cameron T.
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 84 : 47 - 53
  • [23] Management of antithrombotic therapy during cardiac implantable device surgery
    AlTurki, Ahmed
    Proietti, Riccardo
    Birnie, David H.
    Essebag, Vidal
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2016, 32 (03) : 163 - 169
  • [24] Contemporary Management of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation for Cardiac Implantable Device Procedures
    DeSimone, Christopher V.
    DeSimone, Daniel C.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 12 (10):
  • [25] Anaesthetic management of a pregnant patient with cardiac implantable electronic device
    Nair, U.
    Aggarwal, V.
    Jain, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 : 84 - 84
  • [26] Conservative therapy for the management of cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Sekiguchi, Yukio
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2016, 32 (04) : 293 - 296
  • [27] CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INFECTION IN A PATIENT WITH PERMANENT PACING DEVICE: A MANAGEMENT CONUNDRUM
    Prabhu, Sushmita
    Kumar, Sumukh Arun
    Ray, Ayita
    Kumar, Pramukh Arun
    Dasari, Mahati
    Scott, Jeffrey
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 1066A - 1067A
  • [28] Pilot Study of Stimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Pathway with an Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Koopman, Frieda A.
    Miljko, Sanda
    Grazio, Simeon
    Sokolovic, Sekib
    Tracey, Kevin
    Levine, Yaakov
    Zitnik, Ralph
    Tak, Paul-Peter
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S195 - S195
  • [29] Therapy with cardiac implantable electrical Devices in Alter Device Therapy in the Elderly
    Israel, Carsten W.
    AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2020, 9 (05) : 460 - 466
  • [30] Device pocket tissue in the diagnosis of implantable cardiac device infection
    Chua, J
    Abdul-Karim, A
    Mawhorter, S
    Procop, GW
    Tchou, P
    Niebauer, M
    Saliba, W
    Schweikert, R
    Wilkoff, BL
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 384 - 384