Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: Comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols

被引:14
|
作者
Bragard, Jean [1 ]
Simic, Ana [1 ]
Elorza, Jorge [1 ]
Grigoriev, Roman O. [2 ]
Cherry, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Gilmour, Robert F., Jr. [4 ]
Otani, Niels F. [3 ,5 ]
Fenton, Flavio H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Dept Phys & Appl Math, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Phys, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Sch Math Sci, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[4] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FAR-FIELD; DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY; WAVE-FORMS; MECHANISM; ALTERNANS; MODEL; ANNIHILATION; FIBRILLATION; STIMULATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1063/1.4829632
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this article, we compare quantitatively the efficiency of three different protocols commonly used in commercial defibrillators. These are based on monophasic and both symmetric and asymmetric biphasic shocks. A numerical one-dimensional model of cardiac tissue using the bidomain formulation is used in order to test the different protocols. In particular, we performed a total of 4.8 x 10(6) simulations by varying shock waveform, shock energy, initial conditions, and heterogeneity in internal electrical conductivity. Whenever the shock successfully removed the reentrant dynamics in the tissue, we classified the mechanism. The analysis of the numerical data shows that biphasic shocks are significantly more efficient (by about 25%) than the corresponding monophasic ones. We determine that the increase in efficiency of the biphasic shocks can be explained by the higher proportion of newly excited tissue through the mechanism of direct activation. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PUNISHMENT OF SHOCK-INDUCED AGGRESSION
    HYNAN, MT
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1980, 16 (03) : 157 - 157
  • [42] DISPLACEMENT OF SHOCK-INDUCED AGGRESSION
    DULANEY, S
    ULRICH, R
    SCHERRER, J
    JONES, R
    PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1971, 25 (01): : 48 - &
  • [43] On shock-induced damage in ceramics
    Wright, TW
    Ravichandran, G
    CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN THE MECHANICS AND MATHEMATICS OF MATERIALS, 1996, : 480 - 488
  • [44] Shock-induced vaporization in metals
    Chhabildas, L. C.
    Reinhart, W. D.
    Thornhill, T. F.
    Brown, J. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2006, 33 (1-12) : 158 - 168
  • [45] Shock-induced Structural Heterogenization
    Meshcheryakov, Yurii
    Konovalov, Grigorii
    Divakov, Alexandre
    Zhgacheva, Natali
    Osokin, Evgenii
    XXVII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER SIMULATION IN MECHANICS OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES - FUNDAMENTALS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FRACTURE (MCM 2017), 2017, 6 : 146 - 153
  • [46] Determinants of muscular damage with external Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Results of a randomized trial comparing biphasic with monophasic shock
    Fumagalli, S
    Boncinelli, L
    Boni, N
    Padeletti, M
    Virgillo, A
    Franceschini, C
    Aglietti, M
    Marchionni, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 139A - 139A
  • [47] External Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in young and old patients: Results of a randomized trial comparing biphasic and monophasic shock
    Fumagalli, S
    Boncinelli, L
    Boni, N
    Padeletti, M
    Franceschini, C
    Valoti, P
    Baldereschi, G
    Marchionni, N
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 318 - 318
  • [48] BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORMS REDUCE SHOCK-INDUCED RESPONSE DURATION DISPERSION BETWEEN LOW AND HIGH SHOCK INTENSITIES
    TOVAR, OH
    JONES, JL
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1995, 77 (02) : 430 - 438
  • [49] TRANS-THORACIC SHOCK-INDUCED INJURY COMPARING CONVENTIONAL AND TRAPEZOIDAL WAVEFORMS
    ANDERSON, GJ
    WOO, DV
    LUMB, G
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (02): : A148 - A148
  • [50] Estimation of shock-induced buffet onset
    J. P. Singh
    Acta Mechanica, 2001, 151 : 245 - 253