Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: Comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols

被引:14
|
作者
Bragard, Jean [1 ]
Simic, Ana [1 ]
Elorza, Jorge [1 ]
Grigoriev, Roman O. [2 ]
Cherry, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Gilmour, Robert F., Jr. [4 ]
Otani, Niels F. [3 ,5 ]
Fenton, Flavio H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Dept Phys & Appl Math, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Phys, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Sch Math Sci, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[4] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FAR-FIELD; DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY; WAVE-FORMS; MECHANISM; ALTERNANS; MODEL; ANNIHILATION; FIBRILLATION; STIMULATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1063/1.4829632
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this article, we compare quantitatively the efficiency of three different protocols commonly used in commercial defibrillators. These are based on monophasic and both symmetric and asymmetric biphasic shocks. A numerical one-dimensional model of cardiac tissue using the bidomain formulation is used in order to test the different protocols. In particular, we performed a total of 4.8 x 10(6) simulations by varying shock waveform, shock energy, initial conditions, and heterogeneity in internal electrical conductivity. Whenever the shock successfully removed the reentrant dynamics in the tissue, we classified the mechanism. The analysis of the numerical data shows that biphasic shocks are significantly more efficient (by about 25%) than the corresponding monophasic ones. We determine that the increase in efficiency of the biphasic shocks can be explained by the higher proportion of newly excited tissue through the mechanism of direct activation. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SHOCK-INDUCED DEMAGNETIZATION OF YIG
    SHANER, JW
    ROYCE, EB
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1968, 39 (2P1) : 492 - &
  • [32] SHOCK-INDUCED MASS EJECTION
    BERTHOLF, LD
    ASAY, JR
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 24 (04): : 720 - 720
  • [33] Shock-induced chemistry of phenylacetylene
    Dattelbaum, Dana M.
    Sheffield, Stephen A.
    Coe, Joshua D.
    Margevicius, Madeline A.
    18TH APS-SCCM AND 24TH AIRAPT, PTS 1-19, 2014, 500
  • [34] PUNISHMENT OF SHOCK-INDUCED AGGRESSION
    ULRICH, R
    WOLFE, M
    DULANEY, S
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1969, 12 (06) : 1009 - &
  • [35] ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK-INDUCED BY DICLOFENAC
    DUX, S
    GROSLOP, I
    GARTY, M
    ROSENFELD, JB
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6381): : 1861 - 1861
  • [36] SHOCK-INDUCED BY CARBAMAZEPINE (TEGRETOL)
    HONDA, Y
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 4 (3-4): : 265 - 265
  • [37] SHOCK-INDUCED MELTING IN BISMUTH
    ASAY, JR
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1974, 45 (10) : 4441 - 4452
  • [38] SHOCK-INDUCED DYNAMIC STALL
    ERICSSON, LE
    REDING, JP
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1984, 21 (05): : 316 - 321
  • [39] REINFORCEMENT OF SHOCK-INDUCED FIGHTING
    DREYER, PI
    CHURCH, RM
    PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1970, 18 (03): : 147 - 149
  • [40] EXPERIMENTS ON SHOCK-INDUCED COMBUSTION
    LEHR, HF
    ASTRONAUTICA ACTA, 1972, 17 (4-5): : 589 - &