Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US

被引:32
|
作者
Challa, Rohan [1 ]
Kamath, Dipti [2 ]
Anctil, Annick [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Electric vehicle; Internal combustion engine vehicle; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Well-to-wheel emissions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; MIX; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN; ENGINE; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concise abstract: Electric vehicles (EVs) can reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, given the planned electric grid decarbonization. Regulations can also reduce internal combustion engine vehicle's (ICEVs) emissions by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EV GHG emissions relative to ICEVs, and successfully decarbonizing the transportation sector depends on understanding their combined effects. We use life-cycle assessment to compare the EV and ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions in the United States and four other states from 2018 to 2030. We found lower emissions for EVs than ICEVs in most conditions considered. In New York state, where natural gas power plants replace nuclear energy, GHG emissions of electricity generation increase over time after 2020. Future ICEVs can have comparable emissions to EVs due to fuel economy increase. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.Extended abstract: Transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be reduced by (a) increasing the share of electric vehicles (EVs) and (b) reducing GHG emissions of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors, such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EVs' relative GHG emissions compared to ICEVs, and understanding their combined effect is necessary for a successful decarbonization of the transportation sector. We used life-cycle assessment to evaluate the simultaneous effect of the above-mentioned factors on the well-to-wheel GHG emissions of EVs and ICEVs from 2018 to 2030. The analysis was performed for the United States (US) average and state-level for Arizona, California, New York, and Oregon.Our results showed lower GHG emissions for EVs than ICEVs for most conditions considered. GHG emissions are expected to decrease in the US on average by 5% for EVs and 27% for ICEVs in 2030 compared to 2018. In 2030, the ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions were comparable to those of the EVs in the US average and Arizona. EVs perform best in California and Oregon throughout the considered period. In regions, such as New York, EVs driven 2021 and after will have higher GHG emissions than ICEVs, as natural gas power plants are replacing nuclear energy. While EV GHG emissions decrease over time due to grid decarbonization, future ICEVs can lower the GHG emissions, especially for larger vehicles, where EVs might not be the best option. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How will greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles be constrained in China around 2030?
    Zheng, Bo
    Zhang, Qiang
    Borken-Kleefeld, Jens
    Huo, Hong
    Guan, Dabo
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    Peters, Glen P.
    He, Kebin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 156 : 230 - 240
  • [32] Well-to-wheel water footprints of conventional versus electric vehicles in the United States: A state-based comparative analysis
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 204 : 788 - 802
  • [33] A comparative assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles using a well-to-wheel analysis
    Li, Mengyu
    Zhang, Xiongwen
    Li, Guojun
    ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 693 - 704
  • [34] Implications of Driving Patterns on Well-to-Wheel Performance of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
    Raykin, Leon
    MacLean, Heather L.
    Roorda, Matthew J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (11) : 6363 - 6370
  • [35] A comparative well-to-wheel analysis of renewable energy pathways for hydrogen and battery electric vehicles
    Bai, Fanlong
    Zhao, Fuquan
    Liu, Xinglong
    Mu, Zhexuan
    Hao, Han
    Liu, Zongwei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 466
  • [36] A comparative analysis of well-to-wheel primary energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions for the operation of alternative and conventional vehicles in Switzerland, considering various energy carrier production pathways
    Yazdanie, Mashael
    Noembrini, Fabrizio
    Dossetto, Lionel
    Boulouchos, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 249 : 333 - 348
  • [37] A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles
    Ma, Hongrui
    Balthasar, Felix
    Tait, Nigel
    Riera-Palou, Xavier
    Harrison, Andrew
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 44 : 160 - 173
  • [38] Well-to-wheel assessment of natural gas vehicles and their fuel supply infrastructures - Perspectives on gas in transport in Denmark
    Hagos, Dejene Assefa
    Ahlgren, Erik O.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 65 : 14 - 35
  • [39] Developing an hourly-resolution well-to-wheel carbon dioxide emission inventory of electric vehicles
    Kang, Zixuan
    Ye, Zhongnan
    Hsu, Shu-Chien
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 190
  • [40] Projected greenhouse gas emissions for plug-in electric vehicles
    Alexander M.
    Tonachel L.
    World Electric Vehicle Journal, 2016, 8 (04): : 977 - 985