Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US

被引:32
|
作者
Challa, Rohan [1 ]
Kamath, Dipti [2 ]
Anctil, Annick [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Electric vehicle; Internal combustion engine vehicle; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Well-to-wheel emissions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; MIX; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN; ENGINE; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concise abstract: Electric vehicles (EVs) can reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, given the planned electric grid decarbonization. Regulations can also reduce internal combustion engine vehicle's (ICEVs) emissions by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EV GHG emissions relative to ICEVs, and successfully decarbonizing the transportation sector depends on understanding their combined effects. We use life-cycle assessment to compare the EV and ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions in the United States and four other states from 2018 to 2030. We found lower emissions for EVs than ICEVs in most conditions considered. In New York state, where natural gas power plants replace nuclear energy, GHG emissions of electricity generation increase over time after 2020. Future ICEVs can have comparable emissions to EVs due to fuel economy increase. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.Extended abstract: Transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be reduced by (a) increasing the share of electric vehicles (EVs) and (b) reducing GHG emissions of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors, such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EVs' relative GHG emissions compared to ICEVs, and understanding their combined effect is necessary for a successful decarbonization of the transportation sector. We used life-cycle assessment to evaluate the simultaneous effect of the above-mentioned factors on the well-to-wheel GHG emissions of EVs and ICEVs from 2018 to 2030. The analysis was performed for the United States (US) average and state-level for Arizona, California, New York, and Oregon.Our results showed lower GHG emissions for EVs than ICEVs for most conditions considered. GHG emissions are expected to decrease in the US on average by 5% for EVs and 27% for ICEVs in 2030 compared to 2018. In 2030, the ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions were comparable to those of the EVs in the US average and Arizona. EVs perform best in California and Oregon throughout the considered period. In regions, such as New York, EVs driven 2021 and after will have higher GHG emissions than ICEVs, as natural gas power plants are replacing nuclear energy. While EV GHG emissions decrease over time due to grid decarbonization, future ICEVs can lower the GHG emissions, especially for larger vehicles, where EVs might not be the best option. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles in countries dependent on the import of fuels through maritime transportation: A South Korean case study
    Choi, Wonjae
    Song, Han Ho
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 230 : 135 - 147
  • [12] Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions assessment for diesel and battery electric bus fleets based at the Technical University of Havana
    Torres, Yamir Sanchez
    Ramos, Pedro Rodriguez
    Warren, James
    Morris, Emily
    Rodriguez, Ramon Piloto
    REVISTA CUBANA DE INGENIERIA, 2023, 14 (01):
  • [13] Well-to-wheel performance of internal combustion engine vehicles and electric vehicles - study for future Indian market
    Saini, Harshit
    Rama Rao, T.
    Saini, Sanjai
    Anbazhagan, Geetha
    Sharma, Vijay
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2023, 45 (01) : 2089 - 2111
  • [14] Review of Well-to-Wheel lifecycle emissions of liquefied natural gas heavy goods vehicles
    Stettler, Marc E. J.
    Woo, Mino
    Ainalis, Daniel
    Achurra-Gonzalez, Pablo
    Speirs, Jamie
    Cooper, Jasmin
    Lim, Dong-Ha
    Brandon, Nigel
    Hawkes, Adam
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 333
  • [15] Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of heavy-duty transports: Influence of electricity carbon intensity
    Gustafsson, Marcus
    Svensson, Niclas
    Eklund, Mats
    Oberg, Joel Dahl
    Vehabovic, Aner
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 93
  • [16] Well-to-wheel Energy Consumption and Pollutant Emissions Comparison between Electric and Non-electric Vehicles: a Modeling Approach
    Li, Z. J.
    Chen, X. L.
    Ding, M.
    18TH BIENNIAL ISEM CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL MODELLING FOR GLOBAL CHANGE AND COUPLED HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEM, 2012, 13 : 550 - 554
  • [17] Well-to-wheel GHG emissions and mitigation potential from light-duty vehicles in Macau
    Qingbin Song
    Ye Wu
    Jinhui Li
    Zhishi Wang
    Danfeng Yu
    Huabo Duan
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1916 - 1927
  • [18] Electric versus ethanol? A fleet-based well-to-wheel system dynamic model for passenger vehicles
    Benvenutti, Livia Moraes Marques
    de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria
    Vazquez-Brust, Diego
    Liston-Heyes, Catherine
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 115
  • [19] Well-to-wheel GHG emissions and mitigation potential from light-duty vehicles in Macau
    Song, Qingbin
    Wu, Ye
    Li, Jinhui
    Wang, Zhishi
    Yu, Danfeng
    Duan, Huabo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (10): : 1916 - 1927
  • [20] Well-to-wheel analysis on greenhouse gas emission and energy use with natural gas in Korea
    Choi, Wonjae
    Song, Han Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (04): : 850 - 860