The Reliability and Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors Coupled with the Microsoft Kinect to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion

被引:18
|
作者
Beshara, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Judy F. [1 ,2 ]
Read, Andrew C. [1 ]
Lagadec, Pierre [4 ]
Wang, Tian [2 ,3 ]
Walsh, William Robert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Surg & Orthopaed Res Labs, Sydney, NSW 2301, Australia
[4] Vald Performance, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
关键词
shoulder; range of motion; sensor; Kinect; goniometry; measurement; INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY; DIGITAL INCLINOMETER; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; TEST-RETEST; GONIOMETER; MOVEMENT; KINEMATICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/s20247238
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Objective assessment of shoulder joint active range of motion (AROM) is critical to monitor patient progress after conservative or surgical intervention. Advancements in miniature devices have led researchers to validate inertial sensors to capture human movement. This study investigated the construct validity as well as intra- and inter-rater reliability of active shoulder mobility measurements using a coupled system of inertial sensors and the Microsoft Kinect (HumanTrak). Methods: 50 healthy participants with no history of shoulder pathology were tested bilaterally for fixed and free ROM: (1) shoulder flexion, and (2) abduction using HumanTrak and goniometry. The repeat testing of the standardised protocol was completed after seven days by two physiotherapists. Results: All HumanTrak shoulder movements demonstrated adequate reliability (intra-class correlation (ICC) >= 0.70). HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.93 and 0.85) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.75 and 0.53) for measuring free shoulder flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Similarly, HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.81 and 0.94) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.70 and 0.93) for fixed flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Construct validity between HumanTrak and goniometry was adequate except for free abduction. The differences between raters were predominately acceptable and below +/- 10 degrees. Conclusions: These results indicated that the HumanTrak system is an objective, valid and reliable way to assess and track shoulder ROM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of shoulder active range of motion in prone versus supine: a reliability and concurrent validity study
    Furness, James
    Johnstone, Scott
    Hing, Wayne
    Abbott, Allan
    Climstein, Mike
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 31 (07) : 489 - 495
  • [42] Concurrent Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit for the Assessment of Craniocervical Range of Motion in Subjects with Cerebral Palsy
    Carmona-Perez, Cristina
    Luis Garrido-Castro, Juan
    Torres Vidal, Francisco
    Alcaraz-Clariana, Sandra
    Garcia-Luque, Lourdes
    Alburquerque-Sendin, Francisco
    Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza, Daiana
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [43] Validity and reliability of gait metrics derived from researcher-placed and self-placed wearable inertial sensors
    Ruder, Matthew C.
    Hunt, Michael A.
    Charlton, Jesse M.
    Tse, Calvin T. F.
    Kobsar, Dylan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 142
  • [44] Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants
    Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
    Nicolas Boutin
    Alexandre M Dion
    Carol-Anne Vallée
    [J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10
  • [45] Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review
    Keogh, Justin W. L.
    Cox, Alistair
    Anderson, Sarah
    Liew, Bernard
    Olsen, Alicia
    Schram, Ben
    Furness, James
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [46] Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants
    Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick
    Boutin, Nicolas
    Dion, Alexandre M.
    Vallee, Carol-Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 10
  • [47] Reliability and validity of estimated angles information assessed using inertial measurement unit-based motion sensors
    Morikawa, Taiki
    Mura, Nariyuki
    Sato, Toshiaki
    Katoh, Hiroshi
    [J]. BIO-MEDICAL MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 35 (05) : 439 - 450
  • [48] Reliability and concurrent validity of a mobile application to measure thoracolumbar range of motion in low back pain patients
    Macedo, Liane de Brito
    Borges, Daniel Tezoni
    Melo, Samara Alencar
    Aires da Costa, Karinna Sonalya
    Sousa, Catarina de Oliveira
    Brasileiro, Jamilson Simoes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 33 (01) : 145 - 151
  • [49] Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion Protocol for a single center comparative study
    Chu, Hongmin
    Joo, Seongsu
    Kim, Jinyoung
    Kim, Jae Kyoun
    Kim, Cheolhyun
    Seo, Jihye
    Kang, Dae Gill
    Lee, Ho Sub
    Sung, Kang-Keyng
    Lee, Sangkwan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (25)
  • [50] Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit-based 3-Dimensional Angular Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion
    Yoon, Tae-Lim
    Kim, Han-Na
    Min, Ji-Hyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 42 (01) : 75 - 81