The Reliability and Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors Coupled with the Microsoft Kinect to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion

被引:18
|
作者
Beshara, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Judy F. [1 ,2 ]
Read, Andrew C. [1 ]
Lagadec, Pierre [4 ]
Wang, Tian [2 ,3 ]
Walsh, William Robert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Surg & Orthopaed Res Labs, Sydney, NSW 2301, Australia
[4] Vald Performance, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
关键词
shoulder; range of motion; sensor; Kinect; goniometry; measurement; INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY; DIGITAL INCLINOMETER; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; TEST-RETEST; GONIOMETER; MOVEMENT; KINEMATICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/s20247238
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Objective assessment of shoulder joint active range of motion (AROM) is critical to monitor patient progress after conservative or surgical intervention. Advancements in miniature devices have led researchers to validate inertial sensors to capture human movement. This study investigated the construct validity as well as intra- and inter-rater reliability of active shoulder mobility measurements using a coupled system of inertial sensors and the Microsoft Kinect (HumanTrak). Methods: 50 healthy participants with no history of shoulder pathology were tested bilaterally for fixed and free ROM: (1) shoulder flexion, and (2) abduction using HumanTrak and goniometry. The repeat testing of the standardised protocol was completed after seven days by two physiotherapists. Results: All HumanTrak shoulder movements demonstrated adequate reliability (intra-class correlation (ICC) >= 0.70). HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.93 and 0.85) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.75 and 0.53) for measuring free shoulder flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Similarly, HumanTrak demonstrated higher intra-rater reliability (ICCs: 0.81 and 0.94) than goniometry (ICCs: 0.70 and 0.93) for fixed flexion and abduction AROM, respectively. Construct validity between HumanTrak and goniometry was adequate except for free abduction. The differences between raters were predominately acceptable and below +/- 10 degrees. Conclusions: These results indicated that the HumanTrak system is an objective, valid and reliable way to assess and track shoulder ROM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and Validity of a Weight-Bearing Measure of Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion
    Chisholm, Martin D.
    Birmingham, Trevor B.
    Brown, Janet
    MacDermid, Joy
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2012, 64 (04) : 347 - 355
  • [32] USING THE EXOS-HANDMASTER TO MEASURE DIGITAL RANGE OF MOTION - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    WEISS, PL
    AUGUST, S
    PETERS, G
    SAMPALIS, J
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1994, 16 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [33] Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion: A systematic review
    Nuhmani, Shibili
    Khan, Moazzam Hussain
    Kachanathu, Shaji J.
    Bari, Mohd Arshad
    Abualait, Turki S.
    Muaidi, Qassim, I
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (09) : 893 - 901
  • [34] Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dylan Kobsar
    Jesse M. Charlton
    Calvin T.F. Tse
    Jean-Francois Esculier
    Angelo Graffos
    Natasha M. Krowchuk
    Daniel Thatcher
    Michael A. Hunt
    [J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17
  • [35] Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kobsar, Dylan
    Charlton, Jesse M.
    Tse, Calvin T. F.
    Esculier, Jean-Francois
    Graffos, Angelo
    Krowchuk, Natasha M.
    Thatcher, Daniel
    Hunt, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [36] Feasibility and Validity of Discriminating Yaw Plane Head-on-Trunk Motion Using Inertial Wearable Sensors
    Paul, Serene S.
    Walther, Raymond G.
    Beseris, Ethan A.
    Dibble, Leland E.
    Lester, Mark E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2017, 25 (12) : 2347 - 2354
  • [37] Validity and Reliability of a New Inertial Device for Monitoring Range of Motion at the Pelvis during Sexual Intercourse
    Oliva-Lozano, Jose M.
    Martin-Fuentes, Isabel
    Muyor, Jose M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [38] Do inertial sensors represent a viable method to reliably measure cervical spine range of motion?
    Theobald, Peter S.
    Jones, Michael D.
    Williams, Jonathan M.
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2012, 17 (01) : 92 - 96
  • [39] Reliability and Validity of Clinically Accessible Smart Glove Technologies to Measure Joint Range of Motion
    Henderson, Jeffrey
    Condell, Joan
    Connolly, James
    Kelly, Daniel
    Curran, Kevin
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (05) : 1 - 37
  • [40] Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects
    Canovas-Ambit, German
    Garcia-Vidal, Jose A.
    Martin-San Agustin, Rodrigo
    Dalla-Vecchia, Aurelio Arenas
    Sanchez-Barbadora, Mariana
    Medina-Mirapeix, Francesc
    [J]. PEERJ, 2021, 9