Detusking Fence-Breaker Elephants as an Approach in Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation

被引:35
|
作者
Mutinda, Matthew [1 ]
Chenge, Geoffrey [2 ]
Gakuya, Francis [1 ]
Otiende, Moses [1 ]
Omondi, Patrick [1 ]
Kasiki, Samuel [1 ]
Soriguer, Ramon C. [3 ]
Alasaad, Samer [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kenya Wildlife Serv, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Isiolo, Kenya
[3] CSIC, Estn Biol Donana, E-41080 Seville, Spain
[4] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies IEU, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
CROP-RAIDING ELEPHANTS; SELECTION; WILDLIFE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0091749
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers). Methodology/Principal Findings: In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food. Conclusions: Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Elephant Vanishes: Impact of human-elephant conflict on people's wellbeing
    Jadhav, Sushrut
    Barua, Maan
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2012, 18 (06) : 1356 - 1365
  • [42] Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
    van de Water, Antoinette
    Matteson, Kevin
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [43] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Statistical–model based voice activity identification for human-elephant conflict mitigation
    T. Thomas Leonid
    R. Jayaparvathy
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 : 5269 - 5275
  • [44] Ecosystem management to reduce human-elephant conflict in Thailand
    Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee
    Olewiler, Nancy
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [45] Elephant movement mapping in Hosur forest border areas to detect the elephant intrusion pattern and mitigation measures to resolve human-elephant conflict
    Mohandas, Prabu
    Anni, Jerline Sheebha
    Choudhury, Tanupriya
    Thanasekaran, Rajkumar
    GEOJOURNAL, 2023, 88 (SUPPL 1) : 3 - 14
  • [46] Determining baselines for human-elephant conflict: A matter of time
    Pozo, Rocio A.
    Coulson, Tim
    McCulloch, Graham
    Stronza, Amanda L.
    Songhurst, Anna C.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [47] Human-elephant conflict in the Pama Reserve, Burkina Faso
    Nakande, Alassane
    Belem, Adrien Marie Gaston
    Nianogo, Aime J.
    Jost, Christine
    PACHYDERM, 2007, (42): : 81 - 91
  • [48] A quantitative assessment of the indirect impacts of human-elephant conflict
    Sampson, Christie
    Rodriguez, S. L.
    Leimgruber, Peter
    Huang, Qiongyu
    Tonkyn, David
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [49] Management of Human-Elephant Conflict in Thailand : Governmental Perspectives
    Srikrachang, Mattana
    15TH CONGRESS OF THE FEDERATION OF ASIAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATIONS, FAVA-OIE JOINT SYMPOSIUM ON EMERGING DISEASES, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : S107 - S108
  • [50] Community-based human-elephant conflict mitigation: The value of an evidence-based approach in promoting the uptake of effective methods
    Gunaryadi, Donny
    Sugiyo
    Hedges, Simon
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):